Are individuals' desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data

被引:12
作者
Heiland, Frank [1 ]
Prskawetz, Alexia [2 ]
Sanderson, Warren C. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Ctr Demog & Populat Hlth, Dept Econ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Vienna Inst Demog, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Econ, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[5] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Hist, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POPULATION-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE DEMOGRAPHIE | 2008年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
fertility preferences; total desired fertility; wanted family size; West Germany; panel data;
D O I
10.1007/s10680-008-9162-x
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Using West German panel data constructed from the 1988 and 1994/1995 wave of the DJI Familiensurvey, we analyze the stability and determinants of individuals' total desired fertility. We find considerable variation of total desired fertility across respondents and across interviews. In particular, up to 50% of individuals report a different total desired fertility across survey waves. Multivariate analysis confirms the importance of background factors including growing up with both parents, having more siblings, and being Catholic for preference formation. Consistent with the idea that life course experiences provide new information regarding the expected costs and benefits of different family sizes, the influence of background factors on total desired fertility is strong early in life and weakens as subsequent life course experiences, including childbearing, take effect. Accounting for unobserved individual heterogeneity, we estimate that an additional child may increase the total desired fertility of women with children by 0.14 children, less than what conventional estimates from cross-sectional data would have suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 156
页数:28
相关论文
共 91 条
[81]  
UDRY JR, 1983, DEMOGRAPHY, V20, P117, DOI 10.2307/2061230
[82]   Biosocial models of low-fertility societies [J].
Udry, JR .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1996, 22 :325-336
[83]  
van de Kaa DJ, 2001, POPUL DEV REV, V27, P290
[84]  
Van Peer C, 2002, DYNAMICS OF FERTILITY AND PARTNERSHIP IN EUROPE: INSIGHTS AND LESSONS FORM COMPARATIVE RESEARCH, VOL 2, P117
[85]  
VANDEKAA DJ, 1987, POPUL BULL, V42, P1
[86]  
VANHOORN W, 1997, E419974 EUROSTAT
[87]   Conflicting preferences: A reason fertility tends to be too high or too low [J].
Voas, D .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2003, 29 (04) :627-+
[88]   PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF REPRODUCTIVE INTENTIONS [J].
WESTOFF, CF ;
RYDER, NB .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1977, 14 (04) :431-453
[89]  
WESTOFF CF, 1981, PREDICTING FERTILITY, P51
[90]  
Willis R. J., 1973, J POLITICAL EC, V81, P14, DOI DOI 10.1086/260152