Evaluating the quality of public governance:: indicators, models and methodologies

被引:108
作者
Bovaird, T [1 ]
Löffler, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ W England, Bristol Business Sch, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1177/00208523030693002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article provides an overview for this special issue on the evaluation of the quality of public governance. It charts the move in the public sector during the 1990s from concern largely with excellence in service delivery to a concern for good governance. it examines what we mean by governance and 'good governance' and the dimensions of 'good public governance'. It demonstrates that there is now widespread interest in measuring not only the quality of services but also improvements in quality of life and improvements in governance processes. It discusses how measures of good governance are being used in different contexts around the world. Finally, it considers how the measurement of good governance can be encouraged, e.g. through awards, inspections, setting funding conditions and empowering stakeholders to demand better evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 328
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HUM DEV REP
[2]  
*AUD COMM, 2002, QUAL LIF US QUAL LIF
[3]  
BEETHAM D, 2000, DEMOKRATIEMESSUNG, P73
[4]  
BENNETT C, 2001, MEASUREMENT QUALITY
[5]   Moving from excellence models of local service delivery to benchmarking 'good local governance' [J].
Bovaird, T ;
Löffler, E .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 68 (01) :9-24
[6]   Learning from international approaches to BestValue [J].
Bovaird, T ;
Halachmi, A .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2001, 29 (04) :451-463
[7]  
KOOIMANS J, 1993, MODERN GOVERNANCE NE
[8]  
Milner H., 2002, CIVIC LIT INFORMED C
[9]  
NUTLEY Sandra, 2003, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT GO
[10]  
*PERF IMPR UN, 2002, SOC CAP