Determination of the accuracy of implant reconstruction and dose delivery in brachytherapy in The Netherlands and Belgium

被引:30
作者
Elfrink, RJM
Kolkman-Deurloo, IKK
van Kleffens, HJ
Rijnders, A
Schaeken, B
Aalbers, THL
Dries, WJF
Venselaar, JLM
机构
[1] Elkerliek Hosp, Dept Med Phys, NL-5700 AB Helmond, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rotterdam Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Clin Phys, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Oncol, Sect Radiotherapy, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[4] Netherlands Measurements Inst, Dept Temp & Radiat, NL-2600 AR Delft, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hosp Middelheim, Dept Radiotherapy, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Catharina Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands
[7] Dr B Verbeeten Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, NL-5000 LA Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
brachytherapy; dose delivery; reconstruction accuracy; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00300-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To gain insight into the accuracy of brachytherapy treatments. the accuracy of implant reconstruction and dose delivery was investigated in 33 radiotherapy institutions in The Netherlands and Belgium. Materials and methods: The accuracy of the implant reconstruction method was determined using a cubic phantom containing 25 spheres at well-known positions. Reconstruction measurements were obtained on 41 brachytherapy localizers. 33 of which were simulators. The reconstructed distances between the spheres were compared with the true distances. The accuracy of the dose delivery was determined for high dose rate (HDR), pulsed dose rate (PDR) and low dose rate (LDR) afterloading systems using a polymethyl methacrylate cylindrical phantom containing a NE 2571 ionization chamber in its centre. The institutions were asked to deliver a prescribed dose at the centre of the phantom. The measured dose was compared with the prescribed dose. Results: The average reconstruction accuracy was -0.07 mm (+/-0.4 mm, 1 SD) for 41 localizers. The average deviation of the measured dose from the prescribed dose was +0.9% (+/- 1.3%, 1 SD) for 21 HDR afterloading systems, +1.0% (+/-2.3%, 1 SD) for 12 PDR afterloaders, and +1.8% (+/-2.5%, 1 SD) for 15 LDR afterloaders. Conclusions: This comparison show rd a good accuracy of brachytherapy implant reconstruction and dose delivery in The Netherlands and Belgium. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 306
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Comparison of calibration procedures for 192IR high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources [J].
Baltas, D ;
Geramani, K ;
Ioannidis, GT ;
Hierholz, K ;
Rogge, B ;
Kolotas, C ;
Müller-Sievers, K ;
Milickovic, N ;
Kober, B ;
Zamboglou, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (03) :653-661
[2]  
BALTAS D, 1993, INT SELECTRON BRACHY
[3]   Intercomparison of calibration procedures for 192Ir HDR sources in Brazil [J].
de Almeida, CE ;
Pereira, AJ ;
Marechal, MH ;
Pereira, G ;
Cruz, JC ;
Ferraz, JC ;
Giordani, AJ ;
Khalil, CM ;
Martins, RH ;
Menegussi, G ;
Moreira, D ;
Rocha, JR ;
Pinto, MA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (03) :N31-N38
[4]  
*DIN, 1993, KLIN DOS BRACH UMSCH, P6809
[5]  
*DIN, 1992, MED FERNG AUT BETR A, P6853
[6]   A COMPARISON OF ACCURACY OF COMPUTER TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS IN BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
FEROLDI, P ;
GALELLI, M ;
BELLETTI, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 24 (03) :147-154
[7]  
*IEC, 1989, 601217 IEC
[8]  
*IEC, 1996, 601217 IEC
[9]   Reconstruction accuracy of a dedicated localiser for filmless planning in intra-operative brachytherapy [J].
KolkmanDeurloo, IKK ;
Visser, AG ;
Idzes, MHM ;
Levendag, PC .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 44 (01) :73-81
[10]   IN-PHANTOM CALIBRATION OF SELECTRON-LDR SOURCES [J].
MEERTENS, H .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1990, 17 (04) :369-378