3D surface measurement for medical application - Technical comparison of two established industrial surface scanning systems

被引:25
作者
Schwenzer-Zimmerer, K. [1 ,2 ]
Haberstok, J. [2 ]
Kovacs, L. [3 ]
Boerner, B. I. [1 ,2 ]
Schwenzer, N. [4 ]
Juergens, P. [1 ,2 ]
Zeilhofer, H. -F. [1 ,2 ]
Holberg, C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Hightech Res Ctr Cranio Maxillofacial Surg, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Cranio Maxillofacial Surg, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Tubingen, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Tubingen, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Orthodont, Munich, Germany
关键词
3D imaging; surface scanning; laser; white light;
D O I
10.1007/s10916-007-9108-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 3D mapping of flexible surfaces (e.g. human faces) measurement errors due to movement or positioning occur. Aggravated by equipment- or researcher-caused mistakes considerable deviations can result. Therefore first the appliances' precision handling and reliability in clinical environment must be established. Aim of this study was to investigate accuracy and precision of two contact-free 3D measurement systems (white light vs. laser). Standard specimens of known diameter for sphere deviation, touch deviation and plane deviation were tested. Both systems are appropriate for medical application acquiring solid data (< mm). The more complex white-light system shows better accuracy at 0.2 s measuring time. The laser system is superior concerning robustness, while accuracy is poorer and input time (1.5-2.5 s) longer. Due to the clinical demand the white-light system is superior in a laboratory environment, while the laser system is easier to handle under non-laboratory conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 64
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
Laser ranging:: a critical review of usual techniques for distance measurement [J].
Amann, MC ;
Bosch, T ;
Lescure, M ;
Myllylä, R ;
Rioux, M .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 40 (01) :10-19
[2]
Validation of a vision-based, three-dimensional facial imaging system [J].
Ayoub, A ;
Garrahy, A ;
Hood, C ;
White, J ;
Bock, M ;
Siebert, JP ;
Spencer, R ;
Ray, A .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (05) :523-529
[3]
FARKAS LG, 1993, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V30, P1, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030<0001:AAAFOT>2.3.CO
[4]
2
[5]
Comparison of three methods of facial measurement [J].
Ghoddousi, H. ;
Edler, R. ;
Haers, P. ;
Wertheim, D. ;
Greenhill, D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 36 (03) :250-258
[6]
Evaluation of a Semiautomatic 3D Fusion Technique Applied to Molecular Imaging and MRI Brain/Frame Volume Data Sets [J].
R. J. T. Gorniak ;
E. L. Kramer ;
G. Q. Maguire ;
M. E. Noz ;
C. J. Schettino ;
M. P. Zeleznik .
Journal of Medical Systems, 2003, 27 (2) :141-156
[7]
HABERSTOK C, 2005, DIE HOLOGRAPHISCHE M
[8]
Evaluation of a 3D digital photographic imaging system of the human face [J].
Kimoto, K. ;
Garrett, N. R. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2007, 34 (03) :201-205
[9]
*KON MIN HOLD INC, VIVID 900 VI900
[10]
Three-dimensional recording of the human face with a 3D laser scanner [J].
Kovacs, L. ;
Zimmermann, A. ;
Brockmann, G. ;
Guehring, M. ;
Baurecht, H. ;
Papadopulos, N. A. ;
Schwenzer-Zimmerer, K. ;
Sader, R. ;
Biemer, E. ;
Zeilhofer, H. F. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2006, 59 (11) :1193-1202