Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Proteomics: A Strategy for Experimental Work

被引:123
作者
Diz, Angel P. [1 ]
Carvajal-Rodriguez, Antonio [1 ]
Skibinski, David O. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Fac Biol, Dept Biochem Genet & Immunol, Vigo 36310, Spain
[2] Swansea Univ, Coll Med, Inst Life Sci, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
关键词
FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE-EXPRESSION; MICROARRAY; RATES; POWER;
D O I
10.1074/mcp.M110.004374
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In quantitative proteomics work, the differences in expression of many separate proteins are routinely examined to test for significant differences between treatments. This leads to the multiple hypothesis testing problem: when many separate tests are performed many will be significant by chance and be false positive results. Statistical methods such as the false discovery rate method that deal with this problem have been disseminated for more than one decade. However a survey of proteomics journals shows that such tests are not widely implemented in one commonly used technique, quantitative proteomics using two-dimensional electrophoresis. We outline a selection of multiple hypothesis testing methods, including some that are well known and some lesser known, and present a simple strategy for their use by the experimental scientist in quantitative proteomics work generally. The strategy focuses on the desirability of simultaneous use of several different methods, the choice and emphasis dependent on research priorities and the results in hand. This approach is demonstrated using case scenarios with experimental and simulated model data. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10: 10.1074/mcp.M110.004374, 1-10, 2011.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   On the design and analysis of gene expression studies in human populations [J].
Akey, Joshua M. ;
Biswas, Shameek ;
Leek, Jeffrey T. ;
Storey, John D. .
NATURE GENETICS, 2007, 39 (07) :807-808
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Philosophical Theories of Probability
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1932, STAT METHODS RES WOR
[4]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[5]   A new multitest correction (SGoF) that increases its statistical power when increasing the number of tests [J].
Carvajal-Rodriguez, Antonio ;
de Una-Alvarez, Jacobo ;
Rolan-Alvarez, Emilio .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10 :209
[6]   A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate [J].
Dalmasso, C ;
Broët, P ;
Moreau, T .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (05) :660-668
[7]   MultiTest V.1.2, a program to binomially combine independent tests and performance comparison with other related methods on proportional data [J].
De Meeus, Thierry ;
Guegan, Jean-Francois ;
Teriokhin, Anatoly T. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10
[8]   The consequences of sample pooling in proteomics: An empirical study [J].
Diz, Angel P. ;
Truebano, Manuela ;
Skibinski, David O. F. .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 2009, 30 (17) :2967-2975
[9]   Genetic Variation Underlying Protein Expression in Eggs of the Marine Mussel Mytilus edulis [J].
Diz, Angel P. ;
Dudley, Edward ;
MacDonald, Barry W. ;
Pina, Benjamin ;
Kenchington, Ellen L. R. ;
Zouros, Eleftherios ;
Skibinski, David O. F. .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2009, 8 (01) :132-144
[10]  
Dudoit S, 2008, SPRINGER SER STAT, P1