A synergistic antiproliferation effect of curcumin and docosahexaenoic acid in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells: unique signaling not explained by the effects of either compound alone

被引:72
作者
Altenburg, Jeffrey D. [1 ]
Bieberich, Andrew A. [2 ,3 ]
Terry, Colin [1 ]
Harvey, Kevin A. [1 ]
VanHorn, Justin F. [1 ]
Xu, Zhidong [1 ]
Davisson, V. Jo [2 ,3 ]
Siddiqui, Rafat A. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Hlth, Methodist Res Inst, Cellular Biochem Lab, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Lab Chem Biol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Drug Dev Bindley Biosci Ctr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Dept Biol, Indianapolis, IN 46205 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
MOLECULAR TARGETED THERAPIES; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; FATTY-ACIDS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; GENE-EXPRESSION; COLON-CANCER; CYCLE PROGRESSION; DIETARY CURCUMIN; PROSTATE-CANCER; HL-60; CELLS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-11-149
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: Breast cancer is a collection of diseases in which molecular phenotypes can act as both indicators and mediators of therapeutic strategy. Therefore, candidate therapeutics must be assessed in the context of multiple cell lines with known molecular phenotypes. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and curcumin (CCM) are dietary compounds known to antagonize breast cancer cell proliferation. We report that these compounds in combination exert a variable antiproliferative effect across multiple breast cell lines, which is synergistic in SK-BR-3 cells and triggers cell signaling events not predicted by the activity of either compound alone. Methods: Dose response curves for CCM and DHA were generated for five breast cell lines. Effects of the DHA+CCM combination on cell proliferation were evaluated using varying concentrations, at a fixed ratio, of CCM and DHA based on their individual ED50. Detection of synergy was performed using nonlinear regression of a sigmoid dose response model and Combination Index approaches. Cell molecular network responses were investigated through whole genome microarray analysis of transcript level changes. Gene expression results were validated by RT-PCR, and western blot analysis was performed for potential signaling mediators. Cellular curcumin uptake, with and without DHA, was analyzed via flow cytometry and HPLC. Results: CCM+DHA had an antiproliferative effect in SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-361, MCF7 and MCF10AT cells. The effect was synergistic for SK-BR-3 (ER-PR-Her2(+)) relative to the two compounds individually. A whole genome microarray approach was used to investigate changes in gene expression for the synergistic effects of CCM+DHA in SK-BR-3 cells lines. CCM+DHA triggered transcript-level responses, in disease-relevant functional categories, that were largely non-overlapping with changes caused by CCM or DHA individually. Genes involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, inhibition of metastasis, and cell adhesion were upregulated, whereas genes involved in cancer development and progression, metastasis, and cell cycle progression were downregulated. Cellular pools of PPAR gamma and phospho-p53 were increased by CCM+DHA relative to either compound alone. DHA enhanced cellular uptake of CCM in SK-BR-3 cells without significantly enhancing CCM uptake in other cell lines. Conclusions: The combination of DHA and CCM is potentially a dietary supplemental treatment for some breast cancers, likely dependent upon molecular phenotype. DHA enhancement of cellular curcumin uptake is one potential mechanism for observed synergy in SK-BR-3 cells; however, transcriptomic data show that the antiproliferation synergy accompanies many signaling events unique to the combined presence of the two compounds.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 79 条
[51]
The mechanistic rationale in support of dietary cancer prevention [J].
Rose, DP .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 25 (01) :34-37
[52]
Rose DP, 1999, INT J ONCOL, V15, P1011
[53]
Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of two oral formulations of docosahexaenoic acid/eicosapentaenoic acid after multiple-dose administration in healthy volunteers [J].
Rusca, Antonio ;
Di Stefano, Andrea Francesco Daniele ;
Doig, Mira V. ;
Scarsi, Claudia ;
Perucca, Emilio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 65 (05) :503-510
[54]
Schloss I, 1997, S AFR MED J, V87, P152
[55]
Molecular targeted therapies for breast cancer treatment [J].
Schlotter, Claus M. ;
Vogt, Ulf ;
Allgayer, Heike ;
Brandt, Burkhard .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (04)
[56]
Docosahexaenoic acid induces apoptosis in lung cancer cells by increasing MKP-1 and down-regulating p-ERK1/2 and p-p38 expression [J].
Serini, Simona ;
Trombino, Sonia ;
Oliva, Francesco ;
Piecioni, Elisabetta ;
Monego, Giovanni ;
Resci, Federica ;
Boninsegna, Alma ;
Picci, Nevio ;
Ranelletti, Franco Oreste ;
Calviello, Gabriella .
APOPTOSIS, 2008, 13 (09) :1172-1183
[57]
Transcript and protein expression profiles of the NCI-60 cancer cell panel: an integromic microarray study [J].
Shankavaram, Uma T. ;
Reinhold, William C. ;
Nishizuka, Satoshi ;
Major, Sylvia ;
Morita, Daisaku ;
Chary, Krishna K. ;
Reimers, Mark A. ;
Scherf, Uwe ;
Kahn, Ari ;
Dolginow, Douglas ;
Cossman, Jeffrey ;
Kaldjian, Eric P. ;
Scudiero, Dominic A. ;
Petricoin, Emanuel ;
Liotta, Lance ;
Lee, Jae K. ;
Weinstein, John N. .
MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 6 (03) :820-832
[58]
Shekhar PVM, 1998, INT J ONCOL, V13, P907
[59]
Role of curcumin in cancer therapy [J].
Shishodia, Shishir ;
Chaturvedi, Madan M. ;
Aggarwal, Bharat B. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2007, 31 (04) :243-305
[60]
Cell-cycle arrest in Jurkat leukaemic cells: a possible role for docosahexaenoic acid [J].
Siddiqui, RA ;
Jenski, LJ ;
Harvey, KA ;
Wiesehan, JD ;
Stillwell, W ;
Zaloga, GP .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 371 :621-629