Animal production and wheeze in the Agricultural Health Study: interactions with atopy, asthma, and smoking

被引:46
作者
Hoppin, JA
Umbach, DM
London, SJ
Alavanja, MCR
Sandler, DP
机构
[1] NIEHS, Epidemiol Branch, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] NIEHS, Biostat Branch, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[3] NCI, Occupat Epidemiol Branch, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Rockville, MD 20892 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/oem.60.8.e3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Exposure to animals, their feeds, and by-products contribute to respiratory symptoms among farmers. Aims: To investigate the role of animal exposures and wheeze, and to assess whether their impact differs among susceptible subgroups, including atopics, asthmatics, and smokers. Methods: Using the Agricultural Health Study, a cohort of pesticide applicators in Iowa and North Carolina enrolled in 1994-97, wheeze associated with animal production was evaluated and interactions among susceptible subgroups assessed. Logistic regression models were used to examine risk factors for wheeze in the past year among 20 468 farmers. Results: Individuals raising animals requiring direct contact had the highest odds ratios (OR) for wheeze (ORdairy = 1.26; OReggs = 1.70). A significant dose response was observed for both the number of poultry ani the number of livestock on the farm. Farmers who performed veterinary procedures on a daily basis had an OR of 1.51. The odds of wheeze associated with poultry production was greater among atopic than non-atopic individuals. Milking cows daily increased the odds of wheeze in all individuals, with the largest association observed among atopic asthmatic individuals. The impact of dairy, poultry, and egg production varied among smoking groups. Past smokers had the highest odds ratios, followed by never smokers, and then current smokers. The OReggs was 2.88 among past smokers but only 1.46 for never smokers. The OReggs for current smokers of 0.80 might reflect self selection of exposure among smokers. Conclusions: Results are consistent with animal production and respiratory symptoms, and suggest that subgroups may respond differently to exposure.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]  
2-F
[32]   VIABLE SAMPLING FOR AIRBORNE BACTERIA IN A POULTRY-PROCESSING PLANT [J].
LENHART, SW ;
OLENCHOCK, SA ;
COLE, EC .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1982, 10 (4-5) :613-619
[33]   OCCUPATIONAL ASTHMA DUE TO POULTRY MITES [J].
LUTSKY, I ;
TEICHTAHL, H ;
BARSELA, S .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1984, 73 (01) :56-60
[34]  
MALMBERG P, 1990, AM J IND MED, V17, P7, DOI 10.1002/ajim.4700170104
[35]   Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States -: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 [J].
Mannino, DM ;
Gagnon, RC ;
Petty, TL ;
Lydick, E .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (11) :1683-1689
[36]   IGE AND IGG-IMMUNE MECHANISMS DO NOT MEDIATE OCCUPATION-RELATED RESPIRATORY OR SYSTEMIC SYMPTOMS IN HOG FARMERS [J].
MATSON, SC ;
SWANSON, MC ;
REED, CE ;
YUNGINGER, JW .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1983, 72 (03) :299-304
[37]   Chronic bronchitis in farmers [J].
Melbostad, E ;
Eduard, W ;
Magnus, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1997, 23 (04) :271-280
[38]   Determinants of asthma in a farming population [J].
Melbostad, E ;
Eduard, W ;
Magnus, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1998, 24 (04) :262-269
[39]   RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS AND PULMONARY-FUNCTION IN CHICKEN CATCHERS IN POULTRY CONFINEMENT UNITS [J].
MORRIS, PD ;
LENHART, SW ;
SERVICE, WS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (02) :195-204
[40]   SENSITIZATION, CLINICAL SYMPTOMS, AND LUNG-FUNCTION DISTURBANCES AMONG POULTRY FARM-WORKERS IN THE GERMAN-DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLIC [J].
MULLER, S ;
BERGMANN, KC ;
KRAMER, H ;
WUTHE, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1986, 10 (03) :281-282