Assessment of China's climate commitment and non-fossil energy plan towards 2020 using hybrid AIM/CGE model

被引:130
作者
Dai, Hancheng [1 ]
Masui, Toshihiko [1 ,3 ]
Matsuoka, Yuzuru [2 ]
Fujimori, Shinichiro [3 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Social Engn, Meguro Ku, Tokyo 1528550, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Nishikyo Ku, Kyoto 6068530, Japan
[3] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Social & Environm Syst Div, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
关键词
China's commitment; Non-fossil energy; Computable general equilibrium models; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; POLICY; TECHNOLOGIES; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.062
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China made a commitment in Copenhagen to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP from 40% to 45% compared with the 2005 level by 2020, and is determined to vigorously develop non-fossil fuels. This study analyzes the effects and impacts of policies that could help to achieve China's Copenhagen commitments with a hybrid static CGE model in which the electricity sector is disaggregated into 12 generation technologies. Four scenarios are developed, including the reference scenario A, the reference scenario B and two carbon constraint scenarios. The results show that carbon intensity in terms of GDP will fall by 30.97% between 2005 and 2020 in the reference scenario A. and will be reduced further by 7.97% if China's targeted non-fossil energy development plans can be achieved in the reference scenario B. However, the rest of the 40-45% target must be realized by other measures such as carbon constraint. It is also observed that due to carbon intensity constraints, GDP loss would be from 0.032% to 0.24% compared to the reference scenario B, and CO2 emission reductions are due mainly to decreases in coal consumption in the electricity sector and manufacturing sector. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2875 / 2887
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]  
CARB, 2008, AB 32 CLIM CHANG SCO
[12]  
Energy Research Institute of National Development and Reform Commission, 2009, CHINAS LOW CARBON DE
[13]   How do market reforms affect China's responsiveness to environmental policy? [J].
Fisher-Vanden, Karen ;
Ho, Mun S. .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2007, 82 (01) :200-233
[14]   Dynamic formulation of a top-down and bottom-up merging energy policy model [J].
Frei, CW ;
Haldi, PA ;
Sarlos, G .
ENERGY POLICY, 2003, 31 (10) :1017-1031
[15]  
Garbaccio RichardF., 1999, Environment and Development Economics, V4, P493, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S1355770X99000303, 10.1017/S1355770X99000303]
[16]  
HERTEL TW, 2004, GLOBAL TRADE ANAL MO
[17]  
*IEA, 2008, WORLD EN OUTL 2007
[18]  
LI N, 2010, MULTIREGIONAL CGE MO
[19]   Carbon taxation policy in China: How to protect energy- and trade-intensive sectors? [J].
Liang, Qiao-Mei ;
Fan, Ying ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2007, 29 (02) :311-333
[20]  
MAO R, 2007, STUDY APPROACHES MET