Impact of surface chemistry and blocking strategies on DNA microarrays

被引:124
作者
Taylor, S
Smith, S
Windle, B
Guiseppi-Elie, A
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, C3B, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Med Chem, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/nar/gng086
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The surfaces and immobilization chemistries of DNA microarrays are the foundation for high quality gene expression data. Four surface modification chemistries, poly-l-lysine (PLL), 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPS), DAB-AM-poly(propyleminime hexadecaamine) dendrimer (DAB) and 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APS), were evaluated using cDNA and oligonucleotide sub-arrays. Two un-silanized glass surfaces, RCA-cleaned and immersed in Tris-EDTA buffer were also studied. DNA on amine-modified surfaces was fixed by UV (90 mJ/cm(2)), while DNA on GPS-modified surfaces was immobilized by covalent coupling. Arrays were blocked with either succinic anhydride (SA), bovine serum albumin (BSA) or left unblocked prior to hybridization with labeled PCR product. Quality factors evaluated were surface affinity for cDNA versus oligonucleotides, spot and background intensity, spotting concentration and blocking chemistry. Contact angle measurements and atomic force microscopy were preformed to characterize surface wettability and morphology. The GPS surface exhibited the lowest background intensity regardless of blocking method. Blocking the arrays did not affect raw spot intensity, but affected background intensity on amine surfaces, BSA blocking being the lowest. Oligonucleotides and cDNA on unblocked GPS-modified slides gave the best signal (spot-to-background intensity ratio). Under the conditions evaluated, the unblocked GPS surface along with amine covalent coupling was the most appropriate for both cDNA and oligonucleotide microarrays.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] DNA microarrays with PAMAM dendritic linker systems -: art. no. e10
    Benters, R
    Niemeyer, CM
    Drutschmann, D
    Blohm, D
    Wöhrle, D
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2002, 30 (02) : 10
  • [2] New developments in microarray technology
    Blohm, DH
    Guiseppi-Elie, A
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 12 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [3] Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) - toward standards for microarray data
    Brazma, A
    Hingamp, P
    Quackenbush, J
    Sherlock, G
    Spellman, P
    Stoeckert, C
    Aach, J
    Ansorge, W
    Ball, CA
    Causton, HC
    Gaasterland, T
    Glenisson, P
    Holstege, FCP
    Kim, IF
    Markowitz, V
    Matese, JC
    Parkinson, H
    Robinson, A
    Sarkans, U
    Schulze-Kremer, S
    Stewart, J
    Taylor, R
    Vilo, J
    Vingron, M
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2001, 29 (04) : 365 - 371
  • [4] Fabrication of DNA microarrays using unmodified oligonucleotide probes
    Call, DR
    Chandler, DP
    Brockman, F
    [J]. BIOTECHNIQUES, 2001, 30 (02) : 368 - +
  • [5] Manufacturing DNA microarrays of high spot homogeneity and reduced background signal
    Diehl, Frank
    Grahlmann, Susanne
    Beier, Markus
    Hoheisel, Joerg D.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (07)
  • [6] DOLAN P, 2001, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V29, pE10
  • [8] GHEORGHE M, 2003, IN PRESS BIOSENSORS
  • [9] SPECIFIC IMMOBILIZATION OF ELECTROPOLYMERIZED POLYPYRROLE THIN-FILMS ONTO INTERDIGITATED MICROSENSOR ELECTRODE ARRAYS
    GUISEPPIELIE, A
    WILSON, AM
    TOUR, JM
    BROCKMANN, TW
    ZHANG, P
    ALLARA, DL
    [J]. LANGMUIR, 1995, 11 (05) : 1768 - 1776
  • [10] A concise guide to cDNA microarray analysis
    Hegde, P
    Qi, R
    Abernathy, K
    Gay, C
    Dharap, S
    Gaspard, R
    Hughes, JE
    Snesrud, E
    Lee, N
    Quackenbush, J
    [J]. BIOTECHNIQUES, 2000, 29 (03) : 548 - +