The R&D-growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors

被引:65
作者
Ejermo, Olof [1 ,3 ]
Kander, Astrid [1 ,2 ]
Henning, Martin Svensson [4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, CIRCLE, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Econ Hist, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Econ, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Human Geog, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
Swedish paradox; Sectors; R&D; Economic growth; Diminishing returns; System failures; INNOVATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Several notions of a R&D paradox can be found in the literature. In the Swedish Paradox version, the emphasis is normally on high and growing levels of business R&D connected to comparatively low GDP growth rates. This paper examines whether this pattern is consistent over time and, more importantly, which sectors drive the aggregate patterns. Based on an investigation of the entire Swedish economy 1985-2001, there is clear evidence that the paradox occurs only in fast-growing manufacturing and service sectors. Fast-growing sectors show an increasing gap between R&D and value-added growth, while the slow-growing sectors do not. This paradox is not interpreted as a sign of failure of the national innovation system, as the largest gap would then be for the slow-growing sectors, failing to transform R&D to economic growth. The gap between R&D and GDP is consistent with the idea of diminishing marginal returns to R&D investment in high-investing sectors. The evidence does not rule out, however, that rendering the innovation system more effective could yield better outcomes. As the findings of a gap are quite consistent over time, it seems fair to conclude that businesses have good reasons for their high R&D investments, despite not being on par with their production growth. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 672
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]   SCHUMPETERIAN DYNAMICS - SOME METHODOLOGICAL NOTES [J].
DAHMEN, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1984, 5 (01) :25-34
[12]  
DAHMEN E., 1970, ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTI
[13]   The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox' [J].
Dosi, Giovanni ;
Llerena, Patrick ;
Labini, Mauro Sylos .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (10) :1450-1464
[14]  
Edquist C, 1998, INSTITUTIONS AND ECONOMIC CHANGE, P131
[15]  
EDQUIST C, 2002, 20022 VINNOVA VFI
[16]  
Ejermo O., 2009, ENTREPRENEURSHIP INN, P49
[17]  
Freeman Chris., 2001, TIME GOES IND REVOLU
[18]  
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM), 2010, 2009 GLOB REP
[19]  
Granberg Anders., 2006, SCI PUBL POLICY, V33, P321, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154306781778894
[20]   ENDOGENOUS INNOVATION IN THE THEORY OF GROWTH [J].
GROSSMAN, GM ;
HELPMAN, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (01) :23-44