A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys

被引:42
作者
Liang, Shide
Liu, Song
Zhang, Chi
Zhou, Yaoqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Indiana Univ, Sch Informat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Comp Biol & Bioinforamt, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Phys & Biophys, Howard Hughes Med Inst Ctr Single Mol Biophys, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[4] Ocean Univ China, Dept Marine Biol, Qingdao 266003, Peoples R China
关键词
knowledge-based potential; energy score functions; reference state; binding affinity; docking decoys;
D O I
10.1002/prot.21498
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Near-native selections from docking decoys have proved challenging especially when unbound proteins are used in the molecular docking. One reason is that significant atomic clashes in docking decoys lead to poor predictions of binding affinities of near native decoys. Atomic clashes can be removed by structural refinement through energy minimization. Such an energy minimization, however, will lead to an unrealistic bias toward docked structures with large interfaces. Here, we extend an empirical energy function developed for protein design to protein-protein docking selection by introducing a simple reference state that removes the unrealistic dependence of binding affinity of docking decoys on the buried solvent accessible surface area of interface. The energy function called EMPIRE (EMpirical Protein-InteRaction Energy), when coupled with a refinement strategy, is found to provide a significantly improved success rate in near native selections when applied to RosettaDock and refined ZDOCK docking decoys. Our work underlines the importance of removing nonspecific interactions from specific ones in near native selections from docking decoys.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 253
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Weighted geometric docking: Incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan [J].
Ben-Zeev, E ;
Eisenstein, M .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01) :24-27
[2]   Flexible protein-protein docking [J].
Bonvin, AM .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) :194-200
[3]   Molecular recognition and docking algorithms [J].
Brooijmans, N ;
Kuntz, ID .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE, 2003, 32 :335-373
[4]   Stability of macromolecular complexes [J].
Brooijmans, N ;
Sharp, KA ;
Kuntz, ID .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 48 (04) :645-653
[5]   CHARMM - A PROGRAM FOR MACROMOLECULAR ENERGY, MINIMIZATION, AND DYNAMICS CALCULATIONS [J].
BROOKS, BR ;
BRUCCOLERI, RE ;
OLAFSON, BD ;
STATES, DJ ;
SWAMINATHAN, S ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 4 (02) :187-217
[6]   Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking [J].
Camacho, CJ ;
Vajda, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) :36-40
[7]   Protein docking along smooth association pathways [J].
Camacho, CJ ;
Vajda, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (19) :10636-10641
[8]   ZDOCK: An initial-stage protein-docking algorithm [J].
Chen, R ;
Li, L ;
Weng, ZP .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 52 (01) :80-87
[9]   A protein-protein docking benchmark [J].
Chen, R ;
Mintseris, J ;
Janin, J ;
Weng, ZP .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01) :88-91
[10]   PROTEIN-PROTEIN RECOGNITION ANALYZED BY DOCKING SIMULATION [J].
CHERFILS, J ;
DUQUERROY, S ;
JANIN, J .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1991, 11 (04) :271-280