A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys

被引:42
作者
Liang, Shide
Liu, Song
Zhang, Chi
Zhou, Yaoqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Indiana Univ, Sch Informat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Comp Biol & Bioinforamt, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Phys & Biophys, Howard Hughes Med Inst Ctr Single Mol Biophys, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[4] Ocean Univ China, Dept Marine Biol, Qingdao 266003, Peoples R China
关键词
knowledge-based potential; energy score functions; reference state; binding affinity; docking decoys;
D O I
10.1002/prot.21498
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Near-native selections from docking decoys have proved challenging especially when unbound proteins are used in the molecular docking. One reason is that significant atomic clashes in docking decoys lead to poor predictions of binding affinities of near native decoys. Atomic clashes can be removed by structural refinement through energy minimization. Such an energy minimization, however, will lead to an unrealistic bias toward docked structures with large interfaces. Here, we extend an empirical energy function developed for protein design to protein-protein docking selection by introducing a simple reference state that removes the unrealistic dependence of binding affinity of docking decoys on the buried solvent accessible surface area of interface. The energy function called EMPIRE (EMpirical Protein-InteRaction Energy), when coupled with a refinement strategy, is found to provide a significantly improved success rate in near native selections when applied to RosettaDock and refined ZDOCK docking decoys. Our work underlines the importance of removing nonspecific interactions from specific ones in near native selections from docking decoys.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 253
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[61]  
Taylor JS, 2000, PROTEINS, V41, P173, DOI 10.1002/1097-0134(20001101)41:2<173::AID-PROT30>3.0.CO
[62]  
2-3
[63]   Development and testing of an automated approach to protein docking [J].
Tovchigrechko, A ;
Vakser, IA .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (02) :296-301
[64]   Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? [J].
Vajda, S ;
Camacho, CJ .
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (03) :110-116
[65]  
Vajda Sandor, 2002, Proteins, V47, P444
[66]  
Vakser IA, 1997, PROTEINS, P226
[67]   Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking [J].
Wang, C ;
Schueler-Furman, O ;
Baker, D .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (05) :1328-1339
[68]   AN ALL ATOM FORCE-FIELD FOR SIMULATIONS OF PROTEINS AND NUCLEIC-ACIDS [J].
WEINER, SJ ;
KOLLMAN, PA ;
NGUYEN, DT ;
CASE, DA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1986, 7 (02) :230-252
[69]   MOCK and RDOCK performance in CAPRI rounds 3, 4, and 5 [J].
Wiehe, K ;
Pierce, B ;
Mintseris, J ;
Tong, WW ;
Anderson, R ;
Chen, R ;
Weng, ZP .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (02) :207-213
[70]  
WODAK S, 1978, J MOL BIOL, V123, P323