Influence of uncertainty and surprise on human corticospinal excitability during preparation for action

被引:107
作者
Bestmann, Sven [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Harrison, Lee M. [2 ]
Blankenburg, Felix [2 ,3 ]
Mars, Rogier B. [1 ,3 ]
Haggard, Patrick [3 ]
Friston, Karl J. [2 ]
Rothwell, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3BG, England
[3] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London WC1N 3BG, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.051
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Actions are guided by prior sensory information [1-10], which is inherently uncertain. However, how the motor system is sculpted by trial-by-trial content of current sensory information remains largely unexplored. Previous work suggests that conditional probabilities, learned under a particular context, can be used preemptively to influence the output of the motor system [11-14]. To test this we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to read out corticospinal excitability (CSE) during preparation for action in an instructed delay task [15,16]. We systematically varied the uncertainty about an impending action by changing the validity of the instructive visual cue. We used two information-theoretic quantities to predict changes in CSE, prior to action, on a trial-by-trial basis: entropy (average uncertainty) and surprise (the stimulus-bound information conveyed by a visual cue) [17-19]. Our data show that during preparation for action, human CSE varies according to the entropy and surprise conveyed by visual events guiding action. CSE increases on trials with low entropy about the impending action and low surprise conveyed by an event. Commensurate effects were observed in reaction times. We suggest that motor output is biased according to contextual probabilities that are represented dynamically in the brain.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 780
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BELL SYST TECH J
[2]   Prior information preshapes the population representation of movement direction in motor cortex [J].
Bastian, A ;
Riehle, A ;
Erlhagen, W ;
Schöner, G .
NEUROREPORT, 1998, 9 (02) :315-319
[3]   Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability [J].
Bays, Paul M. ;
Wolpert, Daniel M. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2007, 578 (02) :387-396
[4]   Learning the value of information in an uncertain world [J].
Behrens, Timothy E. J. ;
Woolrich, Mark W. ;
Walton, Mark E. ;
Rushworth, Matthew F. S. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (09) :1214-1221
[5]   NEURAL COMPUTATION OF LOG LIKELIHOOD IN CONTROL OF SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
CARPENTER, RHS ;
WILLIAMS, MLL .
NATURE, 1995, 377 (6544) :59-62
[6]   Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency: Evidence for independence of detection and decision [J].
Carpenter, RHS .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (17) :1576-1580
[7]   Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis [J].
Cisek, Paul .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 362 (1485) :1585-1599
[8]   Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model [J].
Cisek, Paul .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (38) :9761-9770
[9]   Visual responses on neck muscles reveal selective gating that prevents express Saccades [J].
Corneil, BD ;
Olivier, E ;
Munoz, DP .
NEURON, 2004, 42 (05) :831-841
[10]   Prior information in motor and premotor cortex: Activity during the delay period and effect on pre-movement activity [J].
Crammond, DJ ;
Kalaska, JF .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 84 (02) :986-1005