A three-stemmed mRNA pseudoknot in the SARS coronavirus frameshift signal

被引:131
作者
Plant, EP
Pérez-Alvarado, GC
Jacobs, JL
Mukhopadhyay, B
Hennig, M
Dinman, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Mol Genet & Cell Biol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol Biol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[3] Scripps Res Inst, Skaggs Inst Chem Biol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
来源
PLOS BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 3卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.0030172
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A wide range of RNA viruses use programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting for the production of viral fusion proteins. Inspection of the overlap regions between ORF1a and ORF1b of the SARS-CoV genome revealed that, similar to all coronaviruses, a programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift could be used by the virus to produce a fusion protein. Computational analyses of the frameshift signal predicted the presence of an mRNA pseudoknot containing three double-stranded RNA stem structures rather than two. Phylogenetic analyses showed the conservation of potential three-stemmed pseudoknots in the frameshift signals of all other coronaviruses in the GenBank database. Though the presence of the three-stemmed structure is supported by nuclease mapping and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance studies, our findings suggest that interactions between the stem structures may result in local distortions in the A-form RNA. These distortions are particularly evident in the vicinity of predicted A-bulges in stems 2 and 3. In vitro and in vivo frameshifting assays showed that the SARS-CoV frameshift signal is functionally similar to other viral frameshift signals: it promotes efficient frameshifting in all of the standard assay systems, and it is sensitive to a drug and a genetic mutation that are known to affect frameshifting efficiency of a yeast virus. Mutagenesis studies reveal that both the specific sequences and structures of stems 2 and 3 are important for efficient frameshifting. We have identified a new RNA structural motif that is capable of promoting efficient programmed ribosomal frameshifting. The high degree of conservation of three- stemmed mRNA pseudoknot structures among the coronaviruses suggests that this presents a novel target for antiviral therapeutics.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1023
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Programmed ribosomal frameshifting in decoding the SARS-CoV genome [J].
Baranov, PV ;
Henderson, CM ;
Anderson, CB ;
Gesteland, RF ;
Atkins, JF ;
Howard, MT .
VIROLOGY, 2005, 332 (02) :498-510
[2]   RECODE 2003 [J].
Baranov, PV ;
Gurvich, OL ;
Hammer, AW ;
Gesteland, RF ;
Atkins, JF .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (01) :87-89
[3]   The frameshift stimulatory signal of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O is a pseudoknot [J].
Baril, M ;
Dulude, D ;
Steinberg, SV ;
Brakier-Gingras, L .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 331 (03) :571-583
[4]   A-1 ribosomal frameshift element that requires base pairing across four kilobases suggests a mechanism of regulating ribosome and replicase traffic on a viral RNA [J].
Barry, JK ;
Miller, WA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (17) :11133-11138
[5]  
Batey RT, 1995, METHOD ENZYMOL, V261, P300
[6]   CORRELATION OF PROTON AND N-15 CHEMICAL-SHIFTS BY MULTIPLE QUANTUM NMR [J].
BAX, A ;
GRIFFEY, RH ;
HAWKINS, BL .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1983, 55 (02) :301-315
[7]   MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RNA PSEUDOKNOT COMPONENT OF A CORONAVIRUS RIBOSOMAL FRAMESHIFTING SIGNAL [J].
BRIERLEY, I ;
ROLLEY, NJ ;
JENNER, AJ ;
INGLIS, SC .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1991, 220 (04) :889-902
[8]   CHARACTERIZATION OF AN EFFICIENT CORONAVIRUS RIBOSOMAL FRAMESHIFTING SIGNAL - REQUIREMENT FOR AN RNA PSEUDOKNOT [J].
BRIERLEY, I ;
DIGARD, P ;
INGLIS, SC .
CELL, 1989, 57 (04) :537-547
[9]   RIBOSOMAL FRAMESHIFTING ON VIRAL RNAS [J].
BRIERLEY, I .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1995, 76 :1885-1892
[10]   NMRPIPE - A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SPECTRAL PROCESSING SYSTEM BASED ON UNIX PIPES [J].
DELAGLIO, F ;
GRZESIEK, S ;
VUISTER, GW ;
ZHU, G ;
PFEIFER, J ;
BAX, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR, 1995, 6 (03) :277-293