Support vector machine based prediction of photovoltaic module and power station parameters

被引:19
作者
Ahmad, Ashfaq [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Yi [1 ]
Zhu, Changan [1 ]
Javed, Iqra [3 ,4 ]
Akram, M. Waqar [1 ]
Buttar, Noman Ali [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Dept Precis Machinery & Instrumentat, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Lahore, Dept Elect & Elect Syst, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Univ Management & Technol, Sch Sci & Technol, Dept Informat & Syst, Lahore, Pakistan
[4] Univ Malaya, Dept Mech Engn, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[5] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Agr Equipment Engn, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Photovoltaic system; power Prediction; seasonal Classification; support Vector Machine; support Vector Regression; SHORT-TERM PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1080/15435075.2020.1722131
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
070201 [理论物理];
摘要
The uncertainty in the output power of the photovoltaic (PV) power generation station due to variation in meteorological parameters is of serious concern. An accurate output power prediction of a PV system helps in better design and planning. The present study is carried out for the prediction of output power of PV generating station by using Support Vector Machines. Two cases are considered in the present study for prediction. Case-I deals with the prediction of PV module parameters such as V-oc, I-sh, R-s, R-sh, I-max, V-max, P-max, and case-II deals with the prediction of power generation parameters such as P-DC,P- P-AC, and system efficiency. Historical data of PV power station with an installed capacity of 10 MW and weather information are used as input to develop four different seasons-based SVM models for all parameters. The performance results of the models are presented in terms of Mean Relative Error (MRE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Additionally, the performance results obtained with polynomial and Radial Based Function kernel are also compared to show that which kernel has better prediction accuracy, and practicability. The result shows that the minimum average RMSE and MRE for case-I with Radial Based Function kernel are 0.034%, 0.055%, 0.002%, 1.726%, 0.044%, 0.047%, 2.342%, and 0.005%, 0.014%, 0.079%, 0.885%, 0.005%, 0.007%, 0.013%, and for case-II with poly kernel are 0.014%, 0.016%, 0.149% and 0.011%, 0.0175, 1.03%, respectively. The present study will be helpful to provide technical guidance to the prediction of the PV power System.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 232
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]
Deterministic and probabilistic forecasting of photovoltaic power based on deep convolutional neural network [J].
Wang, Huaizhi ;
Yi, Haiyan ;
Peng, Jianchun ;
Wang, Guibin ;
Liu, Yitao ;
Jiang, Hui ;
Liu, Wenxin .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 153 :409-422
[32]
A short-term photovoltaic power forecasting model based on a radial basis function neural network and similar days [J].
Xu, Zhenlei ;
Chen, Zhicong ;
Zhou, Haifang ;
Wu, Lijun ;
Lin, Peijie ;
Cheng, Shuying .
THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 227
[33]
A Weather-Based Hybrid Method for 1-Day Ahead Hourly Forecasting of PV Power Output [J].
Yang, Hong-Tzer ;
Huang, Chao-Ming ;
Huang, Yann-Chang ;
Pai, Yi-Shiang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 5 (03) :917-926
[34]
Determination Method of Insolation Prediction With Fuzzy and Applying Neural Network for Long-Term Ahead PV Power Output Correction [J].
Yona, Atsushi ;
Senjyu, Tomonobu ;
Funabashi, Toshihisa ;
Kim, Chul-Hwan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 4 (02) :527-533
[35]
Zhang P., 2011, P SICE ANN C TOK JAP
[36]
Zheng X, 2003, COMMUN THEOR PHYS, V40, P165
[37]
Zhu HL, 2016, ENERGIES, V9, DOI [10.3390/en9010011, 10.3390/en9070511]