How astrophysical mean field dynamos can circumvent existing quenching constraints

被引:17
作者
Blackman, EG [1 ]
Field, GB
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Phys & Astron, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, CFA, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.1351830
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Mean field dynamo theory is a leading candidate to explain the large scale magnetic fields of galaxies and stars. However, controversy arises over the extent of quenching by the backreaction of the growing field. Here boundary conditions and magnetic helicity flow are shown to play a role in determining whether the mean field dynamo action is fast, as required by astrophysical systems, or resistively limited (slow). Existing work suggesting that mean field dynamos are resistively limited include restrictive approximations such as stationarity and periodic boundary conditions that suppress magnetic helicity flow. Thus even though the backreaction is present, such studies cannot unambiguously reveal whether real astrophysical mean field dynamos are dynamically suppressed when the helicity flow is allowed. If the dynamo is sustained by an outflow of helicity from the system, then a magnetically active corona is expected. Open boundaries alone may not be sufficient for rapid dynamo action and the additional physics of buoyancy and outflows may be required. Possible simulation approaches to test some of the principles are briefly discussed. Some limitations of the "Zeldovich relation" are also addressed. (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:2407 / 2414
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   The formation of large-scale structures in supersonic magnetohydrodynamic flows [J].
Balsara, D ;
Pouquet, A .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1999, 6 (01) :89-99
[2]  
BARDOU A, IN PRESS ASTRON ASTR
[3]   Galactic magnetism: Recent developments and perspectives [J].
Beck, R ;
Brandenburg, A ;
Moss, D ;
Shukurov, A ;
Sokoloff, D .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 1996, 34 :155-206
[4]   THE TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC HELICITY [J].
BERGER, MA ;
FIELD, GB .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1984, 147 (OCT) :133-148
[5]   Rate of helicity production by solar rotation [J].
Berger, MA ;
Ruzmaikin, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A5) :10481-10490
[6]   SELF-CONSISTENCY CONSTRAINTS ON THE DYNAMO MECHANISM [J].
BHATTACHARJEE, A ;
YUAN, Y .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 449 (02) :739-744
[7]   A vorticity magnetic field dynamo instability [J].
Blackman, EG ;
Chou, T .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 489 (01) :L95-L98
[8]   Coronal activity from dynamos in astrophysical rotators [J].
Blackman, EG ;
Field, GB .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 318 (03) :724-732
[9]   Constraints on the magnitude of α in dynamo theory [J].
Blackman, EG ;
Field, GB .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 534 (02) :984-988
[10]   Resolution of an ambiguity in dynamo theory and its consequences for back-reaction studies [J].
Blackman, EG ;
Field, GB .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 521 (02) :597-601