Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: clinical outcome and finite element analysis

被引:74
作者
Floerkemeier, Thilo [1 ]
Lutz, Andre [2 ]
Nackenhorst, Udo [2 ]
Thorey, Fritz [1 ]
Waizy, Hazibullah [1 ]
Windhagen, Henning [1 ]
von Lewinski, Gabriela [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Mech & Computat Mech, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
关键词
BONE; NECROSIS; HIP;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-010-1138-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
The osteonecrosis of the femoral head implies significant disability partly due to pain. After conventional core decompression using a 10-mm drill, patients normally are requested to be non-weight bearing for several weeks due to the risk of fracture. After core decompression using multiple small drillings, patients were allowed 50% weight bearing. The alternative of simultaneous implantation of a tantalum implant has the supposed advantage of unrestricted load bearing postoperatively. However, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience. The aim of this study was to perform a finite element analysis and confirm the results by clinical data after core decompression and after treatment using a tantalum implant. Postoperatively, the risk of fracture is lower after core decompression using multiple small drillings and after the implantation of a tantalum rod according to finite element analysis compared to core decompression of one 10-mm drill hole. According to the results of this study, a risk of fracture exists only during extreme loading. The long-term results reveal a superior performance for core decompression presumably due to the lack of complete bone ingrowth of the tantalum implant. In conclusion, core decompression using small drill holes seems to be superior compared to the tantalum implant and to conventional core decompression.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1466
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Hip joint contact forces during stumbling [J].
Bergmann, G ;
Graichen, F ;
Rohlmann, A .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 389 (01) :53-59
[2]
Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction [J].
Bobyn, JD ;
Poggie, RA ;
Krygier, JJ ;
Lewallen, DG ;
Hanssen, AD ;
Lewis, RJ ;
Unger, AS ;
O'Keefe, TJ ;
Christie, MJ ;
Nasser, S ;
Wood, JE ;
Stulberg, SD ;
Tanzer, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A :123-129
[3]
Burstein A.H., 1973, PERSPECTIVES BIOMEDI, P131
[4]
CORE DECOMPRESSION OF THE FEMORAL-HEAD FOR OSTEONECROSIS [J].
CAMP, JF ;
COLWELL, CW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1986, 68A (09) :1313-1319
[5]
COMPACT BONE AS A NON-ISOTROPIC MATERIAL [J].
DEMPSTER, WT ;
LIDDICOAT, RT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1952, 91 (03) :331-362
[6]
IDIOPATHIC BONE NECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL-HEAD - EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT [J].
FICAT, RP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1985, 67 (01) :3-9
[7]
COMPUTATIONAL METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF BONE AND JOINT LOADS USING BONE-DENSITY DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
FISCHER, KJ ;
JACOBS, CR ;
CARTER, DR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (09) :1127-1135
[8]
Clinical and radiological outcome of the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head using the osteonecrosis intervention implant [J].
Floerkemeier, Thilo ;
Thorey, Fritz ;
Daentzer, Dorothea ;
Lerch, Matthias ;
Klages, Phillip ;
Windhagen, Henning ;
von Lewinski, Gabriela .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (04) :489-495
[9]
Fung DA, 2008, ORTHOPEDICS, V31, P494, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20080501-09
[10]
Cytotherapy of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a mini review [J].
Gao, You-Shui ;
Zhang, Chang-Qing .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (06) :779-782