National trends in outcomes for esophageal resection

被引:76
作者
Dimick, JB [1 ]
Wainess, RM [1 ]
Upchurch, GR [1 ]
Iannettoni, MD [1 ]
Orringer, MB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Case-series reports from tertiary centers report improved outcomes for esophageal resection in recent years. The objective of the current study was to determine trends in short-term outcomes after esophageal resection in a representative sample of United States (US) hospitals. Methods. Observational study of all adult patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample who underwent esophageal resection from 1988 to 2000 (N = 8,657). Temporal trends of in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay were determined. Analyses were performed for all hospitals after stratifying by hospital volume. The proportion of patients having surgery at high volume hospitals was used to assess changes in referral patterns. Results. The overall mortality rate was 11.3% and revealed a modest but significant decline from 13.6% to 10.5% during the study period (p = 0.001). Low volume hospitals had markedly higher mortality rates and showed no improvement over time (15.3% vs 14.5%). In contrast, high volume hospitals indicated significant reduction in mortality over time (11.0% vs 7.5%, p = 0.003). Referral patterns changed over time with the proportion of esophageal resections performed at high volume hospitals increasing from 40% (1988 to 1991) to 57% (1997 to 2000). Conclusions. The operative mortality rate for esophageal resection has declined over the past 13 years, particularly at high volume hospitals. Efforts should be made to understand the processes of care underlying this improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 218
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[2]   Measuring the quality of surgical care: Structure, process, or outcomes? [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Dimick, JB ;
Birkmeyer, NJO .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 198 (04) :626-632
[3]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[4]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[5]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[6]   National trends in outcomes for esophageal resection [J].
Dimick, JB ;
Wainess, RM ;
Upchurch, GR ;
Iannettoni, MD ;
Orringer, MB .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 79 (01) :212-218
[7]   Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland [J].
Dimick, JB ;
Cattaneo, SM ;
Lipsett, PA ;
Pronovost, PJ ;
Heitmiller, RF .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (02) :334-339
[8]   Selective referral to high-volume hospitals - Estimating potentially avoidable deaths [J].
Dudley, RA ;
Johansen, KL ;
Brand, R ;
Rennie, DJ ;
Milstein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (09) :1159-1166
[9]   Is surgery getting safer? National trends in operative mortality [J].
Goodney, PP ;
Siewers, AE ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Birkmeyer, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2002, 195 (02) :219-227
[10]   HOW ACCURATE ARE HOSPITAL DISCHARGE DATA FOR EVALUATING EFFECTIVENESS OF CARE [J].
GREEN, J ;
WINTFELD, N .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (08) :719-731