A Continuous Dual-Process Model of Remember/Know Judgments

被引:283
作者
Wixted, John T. [1 ]
Mickes, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
recognition; memory; familiarity; recollection; signal detection theory; SIGNAL-DETECTION-THEORY; RECOGNITION MEMORY; RETRIEVAL-PROCESSES; RECOLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE; DECISION-PROCESSES; EMOTIONAL WORDS; PARIETAL CORTEX; RESPONSE BIAS; FAMILIARITY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1037/a0020874
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The dual-process theory of recognition memory holds that recognition decisions can be based on recollection or familiarity, and the remember/know procedure is widely used to investigate those 2 processes. Dual-process theory in general and the remember/know procedure in particular have been challenged by an alternative strength-based interpretation based on signal-detection theory, which holds that remember judgments simply reflect stronger memories than do know judgments. Although supported by a considerable body of research, the signal-detection account is difficult to reconcile with G. Mandler's (1980) classic "butcher-on-the-bus" phenomenon (i.e., strong. familiarity-based recognition). In this article, a new signal-detection model is proposed that does not deny either the validity of dual-process theory or the possibility that remember/know judgments can when used in the right way help to distinguish between memories that are largely recollection based from those that are largely familiarity based. It does, however, agree with all prior signal-detection-based critiques of the remember/know procedure, which hold that, as it is ordinarily used, the procedure mainly distinguishes strong memories from weak memories (not recollection from familiarity).
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1054
页数:30
相关论文
共 106 条
[41]   Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm [J].
Hirshman, E ;
Master, S .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1997, 25 (03) :345-351
[42]   The role of decision processes in conscious recollection [J].
Hirshman, E ;
Henzler, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (01) :61-65
[43]   Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information [J].
Hockley, WE ;
Cristi, C .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1996, 24 (02) :202-216
[44]   The assessment of recognition memory using the Remember/Know procedure in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and probable Alzheimer's disease [J].
Hudon, Carol ;
Belleville, Sylvie ;
Gauthier, Serge .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2009, 70 (01) :171-179
[45]   What you get out of memory depends on the question you ask [J].
Humphreys, MS ;
Dennis, S ;
Maguire, AM ;
Reynolds, K ;
Bolland, SW ;
Hughes, JD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2003, 29 (05) :797-812
[46]   The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments [J].
Inoue, C ;
Bellezza, FS .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1998, 26 (02) :299-308
[48]   Testing Signal-Detection Models of Yes/No and Two-Alternative Forced-Choice Recognition Memory [J].
Jang, Yoonhee ;
Wixted, John T. ;
Huber, David E. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2009, 138 (02) :291-306
[49]   Recollective Experience During Recognition of Emotional Words in Clinical Depression [J].
Jermann, Francoise ;
Van der Linden, Martial ;
Laurencon, Maite ;
Schmitt, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2009, 31 (01) :27-35
[50]   Recollection, Familiarity, and Cortical Reinstatement: A Multivoxel Pattern Analysis [J].
Johnson, Jeffrey D. ;
McDuff, Susan G. R. ;
Rugg, Michael D. ;
Norman, Kenneth A. .
NEURON, 2009, 63 (05) :697-708