The brain basis of syntactic processes: functional imaging and lesion studies

被引:251
作者
Friederici, AD [1 ]
Kotz, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Cognit Neurosci, D-04303 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Language comprehension can be subdivided into three processing steps: initial structure building, semantic integration, and late syntactic integration. The two syntactic processing phases are correlated with two distinct components in the event-related brain potential, namely an early left anterior negativity (ELAN) and a late centroparietal positivity (P600). Moreover, ERP findings from healthy adults suggest that early structure-building processes as reflected by the ELAN are independent of semantic processes. fMRI results have revealed that semantic and syntactic processes are supported by separable temporofrontal networks, with the syntactic processes involving the left superior temporal gyrus (STG), the left frontal operculum, and the basal ganglia (BG) in particular. MEG data from healthy adults have indicated that the left anterior temporal region and the left inferior frontal region subserve the early structure building processes. ERP data from patients with lesions in the left anterior temporal region and from patients with lesions in the left inferior frontal gyrus support this view, as these patients do not demonstrate an ELAN, although they do demonstrate a P600. Further results from patients with BG dysfunction suggest that parts of this subcortical structure are involved in late syntactic integrational processes. The data from the different experiments lead to the notion of separable brain systems responsible for early and late syntactic processes, with the former being subserved by the inferior frontal gyrus and the anterior STG and the latter being supported by the BG and more posterior portions of the STG. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S8 / S17
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Broca's region: Cytoarchitectonic asymmetry and developmental changes [J].
Amunts, K ;
Schleicher, A ;
Ditterich, A ;
Zilles, K .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2003, 465 (01) :72-89
[2]  
AMUNTS K, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P353
[3]   Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study [J].
Angrilli, A ;
Penolazzi, B ;
Vespignani, F ;
De Vincenzi, M ;
Job, R ;
Ciccarelli, L ;
Palomba, D ;
Stegagno, L .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2002, 322 (01) :5-8
[4]  
Bates E., 1987, MECH LANGUAGE ACQUIS, P157, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0305000900010643
[5]   The neural reality of syntactic transformations: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Ben-Shachar, M ;
Hendler, T ;
Kahn, I ;
Ben-Bashat, D ;
Grodzinsky, Y .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (05) :433-440
[6]  
BORNKESSEL I, 2002, MPI SER COGNIT NEURO, V28
[7]   Functional neuroimaging studies of syntactic processing [J].
Caplan, D .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2001, 30 (03) :297-320
[8]   Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event-related fMRI study of relative clauses [J].
Caplan, D ;
Vijayan, S ;
Kuperberg, G ;
West, C ;
Waters, G ;
Greve, D ;
Dale, AM .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2002, 15 (01) :26-38
[9]   Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow [J].
Caplan, D ;
Alpert, N ;
Waters, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (04) :541-552
[10]  
Caplan David, 1995, P871