Coronary arteries: Diagnostic performance of 16-versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography-meta-analysis

被引:169
作者
Hamon, Michele
Morello, Remy
Riddell, John W.
Hamon, Martial
机构
[1] Univ Caen Hosp, Dept Radiol, F-14033 Caen, France
[2] Univ Caen Hosp, Dept Stat, F-14033 Caen, France
[3] Univ Caen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, F-14033 Caen, France
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2453061899
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of 16-versus64-section computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched for relevant original articles. Criteria for inclusion of articles were (a) use of multisection spiral CT as a diagnostic test for obstructive CAD, (b) use of the newer generation of multisection spiral CT (16 or 64 section) scanners, and (c) use of coronary angiography as the reference standard for diagnosing obstructive CAD (> 50% diameter stenosis was selected as the cutoff criterion for diagnosis of CAD). After data extraction, the analysis was performed according to a random-effects model. Between-study statistical heterogeneity also was assessed by using Cochran Q X 2 tests. Results: Of 328 identified relevant articles, 37 fulfilled all inclusion criteria, with data available for a patient-based analysis in 28. The patient-based analysis included pooled data from 16 studies, corresponding to 1292 patients who underwent 16-section spiral CT, and from 12 studies, corresponding to 695 patients who underwent 64-section spiral CT. Respectively, the results for 16-section CT versus 64-section CT were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93%, 96%) versus 97% (95% CI: 95%, 98%) for sensitivity (P = .03), 69% (95% CI: 66%, 73%) versus 90% (95% CI: 86%, 93%) for specificity (P < .001), 79% (95% CI: 76%, 82%) versus 93% (95% CI: 91%, 96%) for positive predictive value (PPV) (P < .001), 92% (95% CI: 88%, 94%) versus 96% (95% CI: 92%, 98%) for negative predictive value (P < .001), and 72.05 (95% CI: 31.35, 165.56) versus 181.82 (95% CI: 88.70, 372.71) for diagnostic odds ratio (P = .1). Conclusion: Sixty-four-section spiral CT has significantly higher specificity and PPV on a per-patient basis compared with 16-section CT for the detection of greater than 50% stenosis of coronary arteries.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 731
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Ropers, D ;
Pohle, FK ;
Raaz, D ;
von Erffa, J ;
Yilmaz, A ;
Muschiol, G ;
Daniel, WG .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (19) :1978-1986
[2]   Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures - Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Agostoni, P ;
Biondi-Zoccai, GGL ;
De Benedictis, ML ;
Rigattieri, S ;
Turri, M ;
Anselmi, M ;
Vassanelli, C ;
Zardini, P ;
Louvard, Y ;
Hamon, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) :349-356
[3]   Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures [J].
Betsou, S ;
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Katritsis, D ;
Faulkner, K ;
Panayiotakis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :634-639
[4]  
Cademartiri F, 2005, RADIOL MED, V109, P91
[5]   Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines [J].
Devillé W.L. ;
Buntinx F. ;
Bouter L.M. ;
Montori V.M. ;
De Vet H.C.W. ;
Van Der Windt D.A.W.M. ;
Bezemer P.D. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-13
[6]   Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Dewey, Marc ;
Teige, Florian ;
Schnapauff, Dirk ;
Laule, Michael ;
Borges, Adrian C. ;
Wernecke, Klaus-Dieter ;
Schink, Tania ;
Baumann, Gert ;
Rutsch, Wolfgang ;
Rogalla, Patrik ;
Taupitz, Matthias ;
Hamm, Bernd .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (06) :407-415
[7]   Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population - Comparison with conventional invasive angiography [J].
Ehara, M ;
Surmely, JF ;
Kawai, M ;
Katoh, O ;
Matsubara, T ;
Terashima, M ;
Tsuchikane, E ;
Kinoshita, Y ;
Suzuki, T ;
Ito, T ;
Takeda, Y ;
Nasu, K ;
Tanaka, N ;
Murata, A ;
Suzuki, Y ;
Sato, K ;
Suzuki, T .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (05) :564-571
[8]  
GARCIA LJ, 2006, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V296, P403
[9]   16-MDCT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in acute chest pain syndrome: A blinded prospective study [J].
Ghersin, E ;
Litmanovich, D ;
Dragu, R ;
Rispler, S ;
Lessick, J ;
Ofer, A ;
Brook, OR ;
Gruberg, L ;
Beyar, R ;
Engel, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (01) :177-184
[10]   The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance [J].
Glas, AS ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Prins, MH ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1129-1135