Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm

被引:88
作者
Newhauser, Wayne
Fontenot, Jonas
Zheng, Yuanshui
Polf, Jerimy
Titt, Uwe
Koch, Nicholas
Zhang, Xiaodong
Mohan, Radhe
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Grad Sch Biomed Sci, Houston, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/014
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
Contemporary treatment planning systems for proton radiotherapy typically use analytical pencil-beam algorithms-which require a comprehensive set of configuration data-to predict the absorbed dose distributions in the patient. In order to reduce the time required to prepare a new proton treatment planning system for clinical use, it was desirable to configure the planning system before measured beam data were available. However, it was not known if the Monte Carlo simulation method was a practical alternative to measuring beam profiles. The purpose of this study was to develop a model of a passively scattered proton therapy unit, to simulate the properties of the proton fields using the Monte Carlo technique and to configure an analytical treatment planning system using the simulated beam data. Additional simulations and treatment plans were calculated in order to validate the pencil-beam predictions against the Monte Carlo simulations using realistic treatment beams. Comparison of dose distributions in a water phantom revealed small dose difference and distances to agreement under the validation conditions. The total simulation time for generating the 768 beam configuration profiles was approximately 6 weeks using 30 nodes in a parallel processing cluster. The results of this study show that it is possible to configure and test a proton treatment planning system prior to the availability of measured proton beam data. The model presented here provided a means to reduce by several months the time required to prepare an analytical treatment planning system for patient treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:4569 / 4584
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]
Secondary neutron and photon dose in proton therapy [J].
Agosteo, S ;
Birattari, C ;
Caravaggio, M ;
Silari, M ;
Tosi, G .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 48 (03) :293-305
[2]
[Anonymous], 90012000 ISO
[3]
Monte Carlo and analytical calculation of proton pencil beams for computerized treatment plan optimization [J].
Carlsson, AK ;
Andreo, P ;
Brahme, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (06) :1033-1053
[4]
Image-guided proton radiotherapy for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Chang, J ;
Dong, L ;
Mohan, R ;
Liao, Z ;
Cox, J ;
Komaki, R .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 :S93-S93
[5]
Significant reduction of normal tissue dose by proton radiotherapy compared with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy in Stage I or Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Chang, Joe Y. ;
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Wang, Xiaochun ;
Kang, Yixiu ;
Riley, Beverly ;
Bilton, Stephen ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Komaki, Ritsuko ;
Cox, James D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (04) :1087-1096
[6]
INSTRUMENTATION FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER USING PROTON AND LIGHT-ION BEAMS [J].
CHU, WT ;
LUDEWIGT, BA ;
RENNER, TR .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1993, 64 (08) :2055-2122
[7]
Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter [J].
Ciangaru, G ;
Polf, JC ;
Bues, M ;
Smith, AR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) :3511-3523
[8]
Design tools for proton therapy nozzles based on the double-scattering foil technique [J].
Fontenot, JD ;
Newhauser, WD ;
Titt, U .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 116 (1-4) :211-215
[9]
Determination of output factors for small proton therapy fields [J].
Fontenot, Jonas D. ;
Newhauser, Wayne D. ;
Bloch, Charles ;
White, R. Allen ;
Titt, Uwe ;
Starkschall, George .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (02) :489-498
[10]
GOTTSCHALK B, 1991, PROT RAD WORKSH P SC