Glycemic Thresholds for Diabetes-Specific Retinopathy Implications for diagnostic criteria for diabetes

被引:222
作者
Colagiuri, Stephen [1 ]
Lee, Crystal M. Y. [1 ]
Wong, Tien Y. [2 ,3 ]
Balkau, Beverley [4 ,5 ]
Shaw, Jonathan E. [6 ]
Borch-Johnsen, Knut [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Boden Inst Obes Nutr & Exercise, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Eye Res Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Ctr Rech Epidemiol & Sante Populat, INSERM, Epidemiol Diabet Obes & Chron Kidney Dis Over Lif, Villejuif, France
[5] Univ Paris 11, Ctr Rech Epidemiol & Sante Populat, Villejuif, France
[6] Baker Int Diabet Inst, Heart & Diabet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Steno Diabet Ctr, DK-2820 Gentofte, Denmark
[8] Univ Aarhus, Fac Hlth Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
US POPULATION; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; GLUCOSE; HBA(1C); PEOPLE;
D O I
10.2337/dc10-1206
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE- To re-evaluate the relationship between glycemia and diabetic retinopathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- We conducted a data-pooling analysis of nine studies from five countries with 44,623 participants aged 20-79 years with gradable retinal photographs. The relationship between diabetes-specific retinopathy (defined as moderate or more severe retinopathy) and three glycemic measures (fasting plasma glucose [FPG; n = 411,411], 2-h post oral glucose load plasma glucose [2-h PG; n = 21,334], and A1C [n = 28,010]) was examined. RESULTS- When diabetes-specific retinopathy was plotted against continuous glycemic measures, a curvilinear relationship was observed for FPG and A1C. Diabetes-specific retinopathy prevalence was low for FPG <6.0 mmol/l and A1C <6.0% but increased above these levels. Based on vigintile (20 groups with equal numbers) distributions, glycemic thresholds for diabetes-specific retinopathy were observed over the range of 6.4-6.8 mmol/l for FPG, 9.8-10.6 mmol/l for 2-h PG, and 6.3-6.7% for A1C. Thresholds for diabetes-specific retinopathy from receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were 6.6 mmol/l for FPG, 13.0 mmol/l for 2-h PG, and 6.4% for A1C. CONCLUSIONS- This study broadens the evidence based on diabetes diagnostic criteria. A narrow threshold range for diabetes-specific retinopathy was identified for FPG and A1C but not for 2-h PG. The combined analyses suggest that the current diabetes diagnostic level for FPG could be lowered to 6.5 mmol/l and that an A1C of 6.5% is a suitable alternative diagnostic criterion.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 150
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   Retinal vessel diameter and cardiovascular mortality: pooled data analysis from two older populations [J].
Wang, Jie Jin ;
Liew, Gerald ;
Klein, Ronald ;
Rochtchina, Elena ;
Knudtson, Michael D. ;
Klein, Barbara E. K. ;
Wong, Tien Yin ;
Burlutsky, George ;
Mitchell, Paul .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (16) :1984-1992
[22]   Prevalence and Risk Factors for Diabetic Retinopathy The Singapore Malay Eye Study [J].
Wong, Tien Y. ;
Cheung, Ning ;
Tay, Wan Ting ;
Wang, Jie Jin ;
Aung, Tin ;
Saw, Seang Mei ;
Lim, Su Chi ;
Tai, E. Shyong ;
Mitchell, Paul .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) :1869-1875
[23]   Relation between fasting glucose and retinopathy for diagnosis of diabetes: three population-based cross-sectional studies [J].
Wong, Tien Y. ;
Liew, Gerald ;
Tapp, Robyn J. ;
Schmidt, Maria Ines ;
Wang, Jie Jin ;
Mitchell, Paul ;
Klein, Ronald ;
Klein, Barbara E. K. ;
Zimmet, Paul ;
Shaw, Jonathan .
LANCET, 2008, 371 (9614) :736-743
[24]   Three-year incidence and cumulative prevalence of retinopathy: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study [J].
Wong, Tien Y. ;
Klein, Ronald ;
Islam, F. M. Amirul ;
Cotch, Mary Frances ;
Couper, David J. ;
Klein, Barbara E. K. ;
Hubbard, Larry D. ;
Sharrett, A. Richey .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 143 (06) :970-976
[25]   Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States [J].
Wong, TY ;
Klein, R ;
Islam, A ;
Frances, M ;
Folsom, AR ;
Klein, BE ;
Sharrett, AR ;
Shea, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (03) :446-455