New technology integration approach for energy planning with carbon emission considerations

被引:13
作者
Ahmed, Sajjad [1 ,3 ]
Elsholkami, Mohamed [1 ]
Elkamel, Ali [1 ]
Du, Juan [2 ]
Ydstie, Erik B. [2 ]
Douglas, Peter L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Chem Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] PPG, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Energy planning; Carbon mitigation; Technology integration; Mathematical programming; Energy economics; Energy systems; Process optimization; Process systems engineering; SYSTEMATIC WASTE MINIMIZATION; CHEMICAL-PROCESSES; RETROFIT DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION MODEL; COST; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.029
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
070201 [理论物理];
摘要
This paper introduces a systematic methodology and corresponding tools to support the decision-making process for the integration of various improvement options, including new technologies, into existing mature processes. The proposed methodology was applied on a case study focusing on planning the capacity supply to meet the projected electricity demand for the fleet of electric generating stations owned and operated by Ontario Power Generation (OPG). A deterministic mixed integer linear program with a goal to minimize total annualized costs while satisfying various CO2 emission constraints was developed. The results show that achieving the CO2 emission mitigation goal while minimizing costs affects the configuration of the OPG fleet in terms of generation mix, capacity, selection of new technologies and optimal configuration with and without new technologies. By using new technologies including integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) with and without carbon capture and sequestration, the optimum electricity cost obtained was 1.1661 c/KW h at base caseload demand with 60% CO2 reduction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 180
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]
Adjiman C.S., 1998, HDB COMBINATORIAL OP
[2]
Financial risk management for new technology integration in energy planning under uncertainty [J].
Ahmed, Sajjad ;
Elsholkami, Mohamed ;
Elkamel, Ali ;
Du, Juan ;
Ydstie, Erik B. ;
Douglas, Peter L. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 128 :75-81
[3]
[Anonymous], 2007, DOENETL20071282
[4]
Ba-Shammakh M, 2007, THESIS U WATERLOO
[5]
Managing financial risk in planning under uncertainty [J].
Barbaro, A ;
Bagajewicz, MJ .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2004, 50 (05) :963-989
[6]
Bhalerao Y, 2011, INT J CHEM ENG APPL, V2, P439
[7]
BOISVERT RF, 1985, ACM T MATH SOFTWARE, V11, P313, DOI 10.1145/6187.6188
[8]
A rigorous MINLP model for the optimal synthesis and operation of utility plants [J].
Bruno, JC ;
Fernandez, F ;
Castells, F ;
Grossmann, LE .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 1998, 76 (A3) :246-258
[9]
Optimization of Chemical Batch Processes within a Systematic Retrofit Framework including Evaluation of Historical Process Data [J].
Bumann, Andrea A. ;
Papadokonstantakis, Stavros ;
Fischer, Ulrich ;
Hungerbuehler, Konrad .
PRES 2010: 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2010, 21 :919-924
[10]
Carter LD, 2007, WHITE PAPER AM PUBLI