Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials

被引:77
作者
Bernhard, J
Sullivan, M
Hürny, C
Coates, AS
Rudenstam, CM
机构
[1] IBCSG Coordinating Ctr, CH-3008 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Inst Internal Med, Hlth Care Res Unit, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Burgerspital, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Australian Canc Soc, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
[6] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
breast cancer; quality of life; scale comparison; responsiveness; global indicators; randomized controlled trials;
D O I
10.1054/bjoc.2001.1785
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We investigated the hypothesis that global single-item quality-of-life indicators are less precise for specific treatment effects (discriminant validity) than multi-item scales but similarly efficient for overall treatment comparisons and changes over time (responsiveness) because they reflect the summation of the individual meaning and importance of various factors. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) indicators for physical well-being, mood and coping were compared with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), the Mood Adjective Check List (MACL) and the emotional behaviour and social interaction scales of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in 84 patients with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant therapy. Discriminant validity was investigated by multitrait-multimethod correlation, responsiveness by standardized response mean (SRM). Discriminant validity of the indicators was present at baseline but less under treatment. Responsiveness was demonstrated by the expected pattern among treatments (P = 0.008). In patients without chemotherapy, the SRMs indicated moderate (0.5-0.8) to large (>0.8) improvements in physical well-being (0.70), coping (0.92), HAD anxiety (0.89) and depression (1.19), and MACL mental well-being (0.68). In patients with chemotherapy for the first 3 months, small but clinically significant improvements (>).2) included mood (0.38), coping (0.41), HAD axiety (0.31) and MACL mental well-being (0.35). Patients with 6 months chemotherapy showed no changes. The indicators also reflected mood disorders (HAD) and marked psychosocial dysfunction (SIP) at baseline and under treatment according to pre-defined cut-off levels. Global indicators were confirmed to be efficient for evaluating treatments overall and changes over time. The lower reliability of single as opposed to multi-item scales affects primarily their discriminant validity. This is less decisive in large sample sizes. (C) 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1165
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF OVERALL HEALTH BETWEEN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS AND A POPULATION WITH AND WITHOUT RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
AHLMEN, EM ;
BENGTSSON, CB ;
SULLIVAN, BM ;
BJELLE, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1990, 19 (06) :413-421
[2]  
AUGUSTINSSON LE, 1989, SCHMERZ PAIN DOULEUR, V10, P30
[3]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[4]   Quality of life in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer after failure of tamoxifen:: Formestane versus megestrol acetate as second-line hormonal treatment [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M ;
Schmitz, SFH ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Cavalli, F ;
Morant, R ;
Fey, MF ;
Bonnefoi, H ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Hürny, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 (06) :913-920
[5]   Defining clinical benefit in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer under second-line endocrine treatment:: Does quality of life matter? [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Thürlimann, B ;
Schmitz, SFH ;
Castiglione-Gertsch, M ;
Cavalli, F ;
Morant, R ;
Fey, MF ;
Bonnefoi, H ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Hürny, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) :1672-1679
[6]   Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: The IBCSG approach [J].
Bernhard, J ;
Hurny, C ;
Coates, AS ;
Peterson, HF ;
CastiglioneGertsch, M ;
Gelber, RD ;
Goldhirsch, A ;
Senn, HJ ;
Rudenstam, CM .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (09) :825-835
[7]   ON THE RECEIVING END .4. VALIDATION OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE INDICATORS [J].
BUTOW, P ;
COATES, A ;
DUNN, S ;
BERNHARD, J ;
HURNY, C .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1991, 2 (08) :597-603
[8]   ON THE RECEIVING END .3. MEASUREMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE DURING CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
COATES, A ;
GLASZIOU, P ;
MCNEIL, D .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1990, 1 (03) :213-217
[9]   PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE SCORES IN A TRIAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT INTERFERON IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC MALIGNANT-MELANOMA [J].
COATES, A ;
THOMSON, D ;
MCLEOD, GRM ;
HERSEY, P ;
GILL, PG ;
OLVER, IN ;
KEFFORD, R ;
LOWENTHAL, RM ;
BEADLE, G ;
WALPOLE, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A (12) :1731-1734
[10]   IMPROVING THE QUALITY-OF-LIFE DURING CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A COMPARISON OF INTERMITTENT AND CONTINUOUS TREATMENT STRATEGIES [J].
COATES, A ;
GEBSKI, V ;
BISHOP, JF ;
JEAL, PN ;
WOODS, RL ;
SNYDER, R ;
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
BYRNE, M ;
HARVEY, V ;
GILL, G ;
SIMPSON, J ;
DRUMMOND, R ;
BROWNE, J ;
VANCOOTEN, R ;
FORBES, JF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (24) :1490-1495