Developments in Research Data Management in Academic Libraries: Towards an Understanding of Research Data Service Maturity

被引:127
作者
Cox, Andrew M. [1 ]
Kennan, Mary Anne [2 ]
Lyon, Liz [3 ]
Pinfield, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, 211 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Charles Sturt Univ Sydney, Sch Informat Studies, Locked Bag 450, Silverwater, NSW 2128, Australia
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Informat Sci, Informat Sci Bldg,135 North Bellefield Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1002/asi.23781
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article reports an international study of research data management (RDM) activities, services, and capabilities in higher education libraries. It presents the results of a survey covering higher education libraries in Australia, Canada, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the UK. The results indicate that libraries have provided leadership in RDM, particularly in advocacy and policy development. Service development is still limited, focused especially on advisory and consultancy services (such as data management planning support and data-related training), rather than technical services (such as provision of a data catalog, and curation of active data). Data curation skills development is underway in libraries, but skills and capabilities are not consistently in place and remain a concern. Other major challenges include resourcing, working with other support services, and achieving buy in from researchers and senior managers. Results are compared with previous studies in order to assess trends and relative maturity levels. The range of RDM activities explored in this study are positioned on a landscape maturity model, which reflects current and planned research data services and practice in academic libraries, representing a snapshot of current developments and a baseline for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:2182 / 2200
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
Lyon Liz., 2012, INT J DIGITAL CURATI, P126, DOI DOI 10.2218/IJDC.V7I1.220
[32]  
Lyon Liz., 2015, INT J DIGITAL CURATI, P111
[33]  
MANTRA, 2016, MANTRA RDM TRAIN
[34]  
Martin E., 2013, J ESCIENCE LIB, V2
[35]  
Mayernik MatthewS., 2015, International Journal of Digital Curation, P123, DOI DOI 10.2218/IJDC.V10I1.350
[36]   Nongeospatial metadata for the ecological sciences [J].
Michener, WK ;
Brunt, JW ;
Helly, JJ ;
Kirchner, TB ;
Stafford, SG .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1997, 7 (01) :330-342
[37]  
Myatt G., 2007, Making sense of data: A practical guide to exploratory data analysis and data mining
[38]   CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL, VERSION 1.1 [J].
PAULK, MC ;
CURTIS, B ;
CHRISSIS, MB ;
WEBER, CV .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 1993, 10 (04) :18-27
[39]  
Pickard A., 2012, RES METHODS INFORM
[40]   Research Data Management and Libraries: Relationships, Activities, Drivers and Influences [J].
Pinfield, Stephen ;
Cox, Andrew M. ;
Smith, Jen .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12)