3D Variation in delineation of head and neck organs at risk

被引:170
作者
Brouwer, Charlotte L. [1 ]
Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M. [1 ]
van den Heuvel, Edwin [2 ]
Duppen, Joop C. [3 ]
Navran, Arash [3 ]
Bijl, Henk P. [1 ]
Chouvalova, Olga [1 ]
Burlage, Fred R. [1 ]
Meertens, Harm [1 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
van 't Veld, Aart A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Interobserver variability; Interobserver agreement; Head and neck cancer; Organs at risk; Delineation; TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER; MRI;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-7-32
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: Consistent delineation of patient anatomy becomes increasingly important with the growing use of highly conformal and adaptive radiotherapy techniques. This study investigates the magnitude and 3D localization of interobserver variability of organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck area with application of delineation guidelines, to establish measures to reduce current redundant variability in delineation practice. Methods: Interobserver variability among five experienced radiation oncologists was studied in a set of 12 head and neck patient CT scans for the spinal cord, parotid and submandibular glands, thyroid cartilage, and glottic larynx. For all OARs, three endpoints were calculated: the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Concordance Index (CI) and a 3D measure of variation (3D SD). Results: All endpoints showed largest interobserver variability for the glottic larynx (ICC = 0.27, mean CI = 0.37 and 3D SD = 3.9 mm). Better agreement in delineations was observed for the other OARs (range, ICC = 0.32-0.83, mean CI = 0.64-0.71 and 3D SD = 0.9-2.6 mm). Cranial, caudal, and medial regions of the OARs showed largest variations. All endpoints provided support for improvement of delineation practice. Conclusions: Variation in delineation is traced to several regional causes. Measures to reduce this variation can be: (1) guideline development, (2) joint delineation review sessions and (3) application of multimodality imaging. Improvement of delineation practice is needed to standardize patient treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements [J].
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Haber, Michael J. ;
Lin, Lawrence I. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2007, 17 (04) :529-569
[2]
The physical basis and future of radiation therapy [J].
Bortfeld, T. ;
Jeraj, R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 (1002) :485-498
[3]
Reduce in variation and improve efficiency of target volume delineation by a computer-assisted system using a deformable image registration approach [J].
Chao, K. S. Clifford ;
Bhide, Shreerang ;
Chen, Hansen ;
Asper, Joshua ;
Bush, Steven ;
Franklin, Gregg ;
Kavadi, Vivek ;
Liengswangwong, Vichaivood ;
Gordon, William ;
Raben, Adam ;
Strasser, Jon ;
Koprowski, Christopher ;
Frank, Steven ;
Chronowski, Gregory ;
Ahamad, Anesa ;
Malyapa, Robert ;
Zhang, Lifei ;
Dong, Lei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (05) :1512-1521
[4]
Delineation of organs at risk involved in swallowing for radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Christianen, Miranda E. M. C. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. ;
Westerlaan, Henriette E. ;
van de Water, Tara A. ;
Bijl, Hendrik P. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) :394-402
[5]
RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-VOLUME EFFECTS ON SALIVARY GLAND FUNCTION [J].
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Moiseenko, Vitali ;
Marks, Lawrence ;
Chao, K. S. Clifford ;
Nam, Jiho ;
Eisbruch, Avraham .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03) :S58-S63
[6]
Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy [J].
Deurloo, KEI ;
Steenbakkers, RJHM ;
Zijp, LJ ;
de Bois, JA ;
Nowak, PJCM ;
Rasch, CRN ;
van Herk, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (01) :228-238
[7]
Evidence-based organ-sparing radiotherapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Dirix, Piet ;
Nuyts, Sandra .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01) :85-91
[8]
Inter-observer variability in the delineation of pharyngo-laryngeal tumor, parotid glands and cervical spinal cord:: Comparison between CT-scan and MRI [J].
Geets, X ;
Daisne, JF ;
Arcangeli, S ;
Coche, E ;
De Poel, M ;
Duprez, T ;
Nardella, G ;
Grégoire, V .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 77 (01) :25-31
[9]
Geometrical Analysis of Radiotherapy Target Volume Delineation: a Systematic Review of Reported Comparison Methods [J].
Hanna, G. G. ;
Hounsell, A. R. ;
O'Sullivan, J. M. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 22 (07) :515-525
[10]
A review of methods of analysis in contouring studies for radiation oncology [J].
Jameson, Michael G. ;
Holloway, Lois C. ;
Vial, Philip J. ;
Vinod, Shalini K. ;
Metcalfe, Peter E. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 54 (05) :401-410