The relationship between the duration of fecal shedding and the production of contaminated eggs by laying hens infected with strains of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Heidelberg

被引:45
作者
Gast, RK [1 ]
Guard-Bouldin, J [1 ]
Holt, PS [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Egg Safety & Qual Res Unit, Russell Res Ctr, Athens, GA 30605 USA
关键词
Salmonella Enteritidis; Salmonella Heidelberg; chickens; fecal shedding; egg contamination;
D O I
10.1637/7322-010705R.1
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis has remained a significant public health problem for nearly two decades, and Salmonella Heidelberg has also been recently implicated in egg-transmitted human illness. Colonization of the intestinal tract is a necessary precursor to the invasion of reproductive organs and subsequent deposition inside eggs laid by infected hens, but the relationship between the persistence of Salmonella in the intestinal tract and the likelihood of egg contamination has been uncertain. In this study, groups of laying hens were inoculated with large oral doses of strains of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Heidelberg, including variants of the original parent strains that had been reisolated from eggs laid by infected hens in a prior study. The shedding of Salmonella in voided feces was monitored for 6 wk postinoculation, and all eggs laid by infected hens between 5 and 22 days postinoculation were cultured for Salmonella in their contents. The mean duration of fecal shedding was significantly longer for the previously passaged Salmonella strains (26.7 days) than for the original parent strains (17.5 days), and the passaged strains caused a significantly higher frequency of egg contamination (6.4%) than did the parent strains (3.3%). However, the duration of fecal shedding and the frequency of egg contamination were not correlated for any of the Salmonella Enteritidis or Salmonella Heidelberg strains.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 386
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Colonisation of the chicken caecum by afimbriate and aflagellate derivatives of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis [J].
Allen-Vercoe, E ;
Woodward, MJ .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 69 (04) :265-275
[2]  
Angulo FJ, 1999, SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROVAR ENTERITIDIS IN HUMANS AND ANIMALS: EPIDEMIOLOGY, PATHOGENESIS AND CONTROL, P33
[3]   Spreading of Salmonella enteritidis in the cecum of chickens [J].
Asheg, AA ;
Levkut, M ;
Revajová, V ;
Sevcíková, Z ;
Kolodzieyski, L ;
Pistl, J ;
Pilipcinec, E .
FOLIA MICROBIOLOGICA, 2003, 48 (02) :277-279
[4]   Faecal shedding and intestinal colonization of Salmonella enterica in in-bred chickens:: the effect of host-genetic background [J].
Barrow, PA ;
Bumstead, N ;
Marston, K ;
Lovell, MA ;
Wigley, P .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 132 (01) :117-126
[5]   Salmonella infection in a commercial line of ducks; Experimental studies on virulence, intestinal colonization and immune protection [J].
Barrow, PA ;
Lovell, MA ;
Murphy, CK ;
Page, K .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 1999, 123 (01) :121-132
[6]   Further studies on vertical transmission and persistence of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type 4 in chickens [J].
Berchieri, A ;
Wigley, P ;
Page, K ;
Murphy, CK ;
Barrow, PA .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 30 (04) :297-310
[7]   The O-antigen of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis PT4:: a significant factor in gastrointestinal colonisation of young but not newly hatched chicks [J].
Carroll, P ;
La Ragione, RM ;
Sayers, AR ;
Woodward, MJ .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 102 (1-2) :73-85
[8]   Descriptive study of California egg layer premises and analysis of risk factors for Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis as characterized by manure drag swabs [J].
Castellan, DM ;
Kinde, H ;
Kass, PH ;
Cutler, G ;
Breitmeyer, RE ;
Bell, DD ;
Ernst, RA ;
Kerr, DC ;
Little, HE ;
Willoughby, D ;
Riemann, HP ;
Ardans, A ;
Snowdon, JA ;
Kuney, DR .
AVIAN DISEASES, 2004, 48 (03) :550-561
[9]   OUTER-MEMBRANE CHARACTERISTICS OF SALMONELLA-ENTERITIDIS PHAGE TYPE-4 GROWING IN CHICKENS [J].
CHART, H ;
CONWAY, D ;
ROWE, B .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 1993, 111 (03) :449-454
[10]  
Cogan TA, 2003, J APPL MICROBIOL, V94, p114S, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.13.x