Can primary care and community-based models of emergency care substitute for the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department?

被引:42
作者
Roberts, E [1 ]
Mays, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Fund, London W1M 0AN, England
关键词
accident and emergency; primary-secondary interface; substitution; health care delivery; systematic literature review;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00021-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This systematic review assesses the extent to which primary-secondary substitution is possible in the field of emergency care where the range of options for the delivery of care is increasing in the UK and elsewhere. Thirty-four studies were located which met the review inclusion criteria, covering a range of interventions. This evidence suggested that broadening access to primary carl and introducing user charges or other barriers to the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department can reduce demand for expensive secondary care, although the relative cost-effectiveness of these interventions remains unclear. On a smaller scale, employing primary care professionals in the hospital A & E department to treat patients attending with minor illness or injury seems to be a cost-effective method of substituting primary for secondary care resources. Interventions that addressed both sides of the primary-secondary interface and recognised the importance of patient preferences in the largely demand-driven emergency service were more likely to succeed in complementing rather than duplicating existing services. The evidence on other interventions such as telephone triage, minor injuries units and general practitioner out of hours co-operatives was sparse despite the fact that these interventions are growing rapidly in the UK. Quantifying the scope for substitution in any one health system is difficult since the evidence comes from international research studies undertaken in a variety of very different health settings. Simply transferring interventions which succeed in one setting without understanding the underlying process of change is likely to result in unexpected consequences locally. Nevertheless, the review findings clearly demonstrate that shifting the balance of care is possible. It also highlights a persistent gap in professional and lay perceptions of appropriate sources of care for minor illness and injury. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 214
页数:24
相关论文
共 89 条
[51]   USE OF HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM IN RELATION TO USE OF PRIVATE PHYSICIANS [J].
KELMAN, HR ;
LANE, DS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1976, 66 (09) :891-894
[52]  
Lattimer V, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P352
[53]   REFUSING CARE TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS - EVALUATION OF PUBLISHED TRIAGE GUIDELINES [J].
LOWE, RA ;
BINDMAN, AB ;
ULRICH, SK ;
NORMAN, G ;
SCALETTA, TA ;
KEANE, D ;
WASHINGTON, D ;
GRUMBACH, K .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (02) :286-293
[54]   ATTENDANCE AT ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS - UNNECESSARY OR INAPPROPRIATE [J].
LOWY, A ;
KOHLER, B ;
NICHOLL, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1994, 16 (02) :134-140
[55]  
MCKEE CM, 1990, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V40, P150
[56]   RELOCATING PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS FROM TERTIARY HOSPITAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERS [J].
MERRILL, JM ;
LOUNSBURY, BJ ;
GOPALAKRISHNA, GS ;
MACMAHON, AE ;
SANFORD, S ;
BOISAUBIN, EV .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 73 (06) :780-783
[57]  
Middleton E L, 1993, Nursingconnections, V6, P29
[58]  
Moore G T, 1972, Med Care, V10, P240, DOI 10.1097/00005650-197205000-00006
[59]  
Mulrow CD, 1996, COCHRANE COLLABORATI
[60]   Effect of the introduction of a financial incentive for fee-paying A&E attenders to consult their general practitioner before attending the A&E department [J].
Murphy, AW ;
Leonard, C ;
Plunkett, PK ;
Bury, G ;
Lynam, F ;
Smith, M ;
Gibney, D .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1997, 14 (05) :407-410