Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis)

被引:158
作者
Mosteller, F
Colditz, GA
机构
[1] Technology Assessment Group, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston
关键词
meta-analysis; review; research synthesis; overview; study design; heterogeneity;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.000245
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Synthesis of research findings has long been a part of reviewing and summarizing a field of study. Public health decisions are made on the available evidence. We summarize the approaches to research synthesis that draw on the best available evidence and the use of quantitative summaries through meta-analysis. We focus on observational studies. Heterogeneity offers the potential to observe a relation across study populations and circumstances. We emphasize the benefits of heterogeneity in overviews and the need to explore and describe the sources of heterogeneity. Random effects approaches to combining data are recommended, and the use of regression approaches is emphasized. Excluding studies with extreme results may bias a research synthesis and underestimate the true variance of the results, thus contributing to misleading inference. Thorough searching is the best guard against publication bias. We conclude with guidelines for combining epidemiological studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [31] Day, 1979, QUASIEXPERIMENTATION, V351
  • [32] ITERATIVE GENERALIZED LEAST-SQUARES FOR METAANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL-DATA AT MULTIPLE TIMES
    DEAR, KBG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) : 989 - 1002
  • [33] REPORTING ON METHODS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    CHARETTE, LJ
    MCPEEK, B
    MOSTELLER, F
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 306 (22) : 1332 - 1337
  • [34] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [35] INCORPORATING VARIATIONS IN THE QUALITY OF INDIVIDUAL RANDOMIZED TRIALS INTO METAANALYSIS
    DETSKY, AS
    NAYLOR, CD
    OROURKE, K
    MCGEER, AJ
    LABBE, KA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (03) : 255 - 265
  • [36] DuMouchel, 1990, STAT METHODOLOGY PHA, V10, P509, DOI [DOI 10.1177/096228020101000404, 10.1177/096228020101000404]
  • [37] MISLEADING METAANALYSIS
    EGGER, M
    SMITH, GD
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6982): : 752 - 754
  • [38] AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF THE POSSIBLE RELATION OF TREATMENT DIFFERENCES TO QUALITY SCORES IN CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS
    EMERSON, JD
    BURDICK, E
    HOAGLIN, DC
    MOSTELLER, F
    CHALMERS, TC
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1990, 11 (05): : 339 - 352
  • [39] Emerson JD, 1993, J ITALIAN STAT SOC, V2, P269
  • [40] EMERSON JH, 1996, IN PRESS STAT MED