Regional allocation of carbon dioxide abatement in China

被引:233
作者
Wei, Chu [1 ,2 ]
Ni, Jinlan [3 ]
Du, Limin [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr European Econ Res, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Univ Nebraska Omaha, Coll Business Adm, Omaha, NE USA
[4] Zhejiang Univ, China Acad W Reg Dev, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon dioxide abatement; Regional allocation; China; Abatement Capacity Index; Extended Slacks-Based Measure; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; SHADOW PRICES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; CO2; EMISSIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; OECD; PERFORMANCE; INTENSITY; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2011.06.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to identify which provinces will be allocated more (less) of a carbon dioxide reduction burden within China's pledge to reduce its carbon intensity at the Copenhagen conference. Using an extended Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) model incorporating an undesirable output, the CO2 reduction potential and marginal abatement costs are estimated for 29 provinces over the period 1995-2007. The CO2 Abatement Capacity Index (ACI) is constructed based on weighted equity and efficiency indexes. We find that there exists a large gap in potential reduction capability and marginal abatement cost among the eastern. middle and western regions. The eastern region has the least inefficient emission and the highest marginal abatement cost, while the western region has the largest potential reduction capability and the lowest marginal cost faced in reducing CO2 emissions. The difference in potential CO2 abatement among the provinces results from different industry structures, energy compositions and degrees of the openness of trade. The ACI ranking and the final allocation among provinces depend on the policy-makers' preferences regarding equity and efficiency. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 565
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[11]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[12]  
COELLI T, 1996, 968 U NEW ENGL DEP E
[13]   The price of pollution: A dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances [J].
Coggins, JS ;
Swinton, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :58-72
[14]   Characteristics of a polluting technology:: theory and practice [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Noh, DW ;
Weber, W .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 126 (02) :469-492
[15]   Environmental performance:: an index number approach [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Hernandez-Sancho, F .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (04) :343-352
[16]   DERIVATION OF SHADOW PRICES FOR UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS - A DISTANCE FUNCTION-APPROACH [J].
FARE, R ;
GROSSKOPF, S ;
LOVELL, CAK ;
YAISAWARNG, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1993, 75 (02) :374-380
[17]   THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY [J].
FARRELL, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1957, 120 (03) :253-290
[18]  
Fisher-Vanden K, 2004, RESOUR ENERGY ECON, V26, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.resenecco.2003.07.002
[19]  
Fukuyama H., 2009, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V43, P274, DOI [10.1016/j.seps.2008.12.001, DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2008.12.001]
[20]  
Global Commons Institute, 1997, CONTR CONV GLOB SOL