Emission Standards and Monitoring Strategies in a Hierarchical Setting

被引:5
作者
Arguedas, Carmen [1 ]
Rousseau, Sandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Anal Econ Teoria Econ & Hist Econ, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Econ & Business, CEDON, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Pollution standards; Monitoring; Non-compliance; PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODEL; ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION; REGULATORY CHOICE; ENFORCEMENT; FEDERALISM;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-014-9772-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we consider a hierarchical model of environmental regulation and enforcement to study the standard setting decision made by a national regulator and the monitoring decision made by a local enforcement agency. The problem is interesting due to differences in both available information and objectives at local and national levels. Generally, the national regulator is less informed than the local agency about the characteristics of the polluting agents. This leads to the use of uniform standards and the delegation of the enforcement activity to the local agency. On the one hand, the local agency partially corrects for the inefficiency caused by uniform standards by setting a differentiated inspection strategy. On the other hand, the level of the standard is distorted to partially correct for the inefficiency caused by the divergence between national and local objectives. The interactions between local and national decisions are influenced by the size of the divergence in objectives and the level of environmental damages.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 412
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   To comply or not to comply? Pollution standard setting under costly monitoring and sanctioning [J].
Arguedas, Carmen .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 41 (02) :155-168
[2]   Learning about compliance under asymmetric information [J].
Arguedas, Carmen ;
Rousseau, Sandra .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (01) :55-73
[3]   Enforcement principles and environmental agencies: Principal-agent relationships in a delegated environmental program [J].
Atlas, Mark .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 2007, 41 (04) :939-980
[4]   Optimal regional redistribution under asymmetric information [J].
Bordignon, M ;
Manasse, P ;
Tabellini, G .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (03) :709-723
[5]   Tax competition and revelation of preferences for public expenditure [J].
Bucovetsky, S ;
Marchand, M ;
Pestieau, P .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1998, 44 (03) :367-390
[6]  
Cohen M. A., 2000, INT YB ENV RESOURCE, VIII
[8]   Local public goods, risk sharing, and private information in federal systems [J].
Cornes, RC ;
Silva, ECD .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2000, 47 (01) :39-60
[9]  
Cremer H., 1996, International Taxation and Public Finance, V3, p, P157