Policy analysis of authorisation procedures for wind energy deployment in Spain

被引:35
作者
Iglesias, Guillermo [2 ]
del Rio, Pablo [1 ]
Angel Dopico, Jesus [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Madrid 28037, Spain
[2] Univ A Coruna, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, La Coruna 15071, Spain
关键词
Wind energy; Administrative procedures; Spain; RENEWABLE ENERGY; POWER; FARMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.033
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to analyse the administrative procedures for the granting of authorisations for the siting of wind farms in Spain, currently the competency of regional authorities. The analysis reveals some commonalities and differences between the procedures across regions. Furthermore, some aspects regarding these procedures have raised the concern of different stakeholders, including the central government and wind energy investors. A conflict between the interests of the central and regional governments can be observed. Lack of coordination between the different administrative levels and the "more is better mentality" of regional authorities have led to a significant growth of wind energy requests for the (national) feed-in tariff. In turn, investors have complained about the discretionarity and non-transparency of those procedures and the lack of homogeneity across regions. This is likely to result in delays, uncertainty for investors and higher transaction costs. Although there has been a trend to a model which involves the use of multicriteria bidding procedures with more explicit, objective and precise criteria regarding project selection, the aforementioned problems suggest the need to improve coordination between the different administrative levels. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4067 / 4076
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]   The mismatch between regional spatial planning for wind power development in Germany and national eligibility criteria for feed-in tariffs-A case study in West Saxony [J].
Ohl, Cornelia ;
Eichhorn, Marcus .
LAND USE POLICY, 2010, 27 (02) :243-254
[32]  
Otto S., 2010, COMMUNICATION 1004
[33]  
Parkhill Karen, 2007, European Environment, V17, P307, DOI 10.1002/eet.461
[34]   The political economy of an energy tax: The United Kingdom's climate change levy [J].
Pearce, D .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (02) :149-158
[35]   Wind power planning and permitting: Comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries [J].
Pettersson, Maria ;
Ek, Kristina ;
Soderholm, Kristina ;
Soderholm, Patrik .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (09) :3116-3123
[36]  
Ragwitz Marioet al., 2007, OPTRES ASSESSMENT OP
[37]   Promotion of new wind farms based on a decision support system [J].
Ramirez-Rosado, Ignacio J. ;
Garcia-Garridoa, Eduardo ;
Fernandez-Jimenez, L. Alfredo ;
Zorzano-Santamaria, Pedro J. ;
Monteiro, Claudio ;
Miranda, Vladimiro .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2008, 33 (04) :558-566
[38]   Barriers to the introduction of market-based instruments in climate policies: an integrated theoretical framework [J].
del Río P. ;
Labandeira X. .
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2009, 10 (1) :41-68
[39]  
SECO E, 2010, CINCO DIAS
[40]   Evaluation of wind power planning in Denmark - Towards an integrated perspective [J].
Sperling, Karl ;
Hvelplund, Frede ;
Mathiesen, Brian Vad .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) :5443-5454