Attitudes, knowledge, risk perceptions and decision-making among women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and their spouses

被引:19
作者
Bluman, LG
Rimer, BK
Sterba, KR
Lancaster, J
Clark, S
Borstelmann, N
Iglehart, JD
Winer, EP
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Breast Oncol Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] NCI, NIH, Div Canc Control & Populat, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Durham, NC USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/pon.653
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A limited number of studies have examined the involvement of spouses in the decision-making process for genetic testing as well as impact of the actual testing. This report presents data from 40 women with a personal history of breast and/or ovarian cancer who were considering genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and their spouses. We examined knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility, perceptions of the likelihood that their wives (the women) had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, pros and cons of genetic testing, spouses' satisfaction with their involvement in the decision-making process and additional resources they would find helpful. Knowledge about cancer genetics and genetic testing for BRCA1 and BCA2 was limited among both women and their spouses. Up to one-third of spouses indicated that they would like to avail themselves of additional sources of information about BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing. Most spouses indicated that they thought their wives had a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and that their wives' breast cancers would recur. Pros of genetic testing were emphasized more than cons among both parties. Overall, spouses were satisfied with their role in the decision-making process. Future interventions to improve the decision-making process regarding genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility should be undertaken. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 427
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Gender roles, marital intimacy, and nomination of spouse as primary caregiver [J].
Allen, SM ;
Goldscheider, F ;
Ciambrone, DA .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1999, 39 (02) :150-158
[2]   Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Bluman, LG ;
Rimer, BK ;
Berry, DA ;
Borstelmann, N ;
Iglehart, JD ;
Regan, K ;
Schildkraut, J ;
Winer, EP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) :1040-1046
[3]   WOMENS RECEPTIVITY TO TESTING FOR A GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BREAST-CANCER [J].
CHALIKI, H ;
LOADER, S ;
LEVENKRON, JC ;
LOGANYOUNG, W ;
HALL, WJ ;
ROWLEY, PT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (08) :1133-1135
[4]  
Clark S, 2000, J Genet Couns, V9, P219, DOI 10.1023/A:1009463905057
[5]   Marital status, marital satisfaction, and support processes among women at high risk for breast cancer [J].
Coyne, JC ;
Anderson, KK .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) :629-641
[6]   INTEREST IN GENETIC TESTING FOR COLON CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY - COGNITIVE AND EMOTIONAL CORRELATES [J].
CROYLE, RT ;
LERMAN, C .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (02) :284-292
[7]  
Cutrona C.E., 1996, Sage Series on Close Relationships
[8]  
Germino B B, 1995, Semin Oncol Nurs, V11, P43, DOI 10.1016/S0749-2081(95)80042-5
[9]  
HUGHES CA, 1997, THESIS HOWARD U WASH
[10]   FORGOTTEN PERSON IN THE HUNTINGTON DISEASE FAMILY [J].
KESSLER, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1993, 48 (03) :145-150