Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: How many radioactive nodes should be removed?

被引:140
作者
McMasters, KM
Reintgen, DS
Ross, MI
Wong, SL
Gershenwald, JE
Krag, DN
Noyes, RD
Viar, V
Cerrito, PB
Edwards, MJ
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, James Graham Brown Canc Ctr, Div Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Math, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Tampa, FL 33682 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Dept Surg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[6] LDS Hosp, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
melanoma; sentinel lymph node; lymph node dissection; lymphoscintigraphy; lymphatic mapping;
D O I
10.1007/s10434-001-0192-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become a standard methtod of staging patients with cutaneous melanoma Sentinel lymph node biopsy usually is performed by intradermal injection of a vital blue dye (isosulfan blue) plus radioactive colloid (technetium sulfur colloid) around the site of the tumor. Intraoperative gamma probe detection has been shown to improve the rate of SLN identification compared to the use of blue dye alone. However, multiple sentinel nodes often are detected using the gamma probe. It is not clear whether these additional lymph nodes represent true sentinel nodes, or second-echelon lymph nodes that have received radiocolloid particles that have passed through the hue sentinel node. This analysis was performed to determine the frequency with which these less radioactive lymph nodes contain metastatic disease when the most radioactive, or "hottest," node does not. Materials and Methods: In the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial, 1184 patients with cutaneous melanoma of Breslow thickness 1.0 mm or more had sentinel lymph nodes identified. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed by injection of technetium sulfur colloid plus isosulfan blue dye in 99% of cases. Intraoperative determination of the degree of radioactivity of sentinel nodes lex vivo) was measured, as well as the degree of blue dye staining. Results: Sentinel nodes were identified in 1373 nodal basins in 1184 patients. A total of 288 of 1184 patients (24.3%) were found to have sentinel node metastases detected by histology or immunohistochemistry. Nodal metastases were detected in 306 nodal basins in these 288 patients. There were 175 nodal basins from 170 patients in which at least one positive sentinel node was found and more than one sentinel node was harvested. Blue dye staining was found in 86.3% of the histologically positive sentinel nodes and 66.4% of the(: negative sentinel nodes. In 40 of 306 positive nodal basins (13.1%), the most radioactive sentinel node was negative for tumor when another, less radioactive, sentinel node was positive for tumor. In 20 of 40 cases (50%), the less radioactive positive sentinel node contained 50% or less of the radioactive count of the hottest lymph node. The cervical lymph node basin was associated with an increased likelihood of finding a positive sentinel node other than the hottest node. Conclusions: If only the most radioactive sentinel node in each basin had been removed, 13.1% of the nodal basins with positive sentinel nodes would have been missed. It is recommended that all blue lymph nodes and all nodes that measure 10% or higher of the ex vivo radioactive count of the hottest sentinel node should be harvested for optimal detection of nodal metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 197
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma
    Albertini, JJ
    Cruse, CW
    Rapaport, D
    Wells, K
    Ross, M
    DeConti, R
    Berman, CG
    Jared, K
    Messina, J
    Lyman, G
    Glass, F
    Fenske, N
    Reintgen, DS
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 223 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [2] Sentinel node localization in cutaneous melanoma: lymphoscintigraphy with colloids and antibody fragments versus blue dye mapping
    Bartolomei, M
    Testori, A
    Chinol, M
    Gennari, R
    De Cicco, C
    Leonardi, L
    Zoboli, S
    Paganelli, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 25 (11) : 1489 - 1494
  • [3] Improved sentinel lymph node localization in patients with primary melanoma with the use of radiolabeled colloid
    Gershenwald, JE
    Tseng, CH
    Thompson, W
    Mansfield, PF
    Lee, JE
    Bouvet, M
    Lee, JJ
    Ross, MI
    [J]. SURGERY, 1998, 124 (02) : 203 - 210
  • [4] The use of intraoperative radiolymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node biopsy in patients with malignant melanoma
    Glass, LF
    Messina, JL
    Cruse, W
    Wells, K
    Rapaport, D
    Miliotes, G
    Berman, C
    Reintgen, D
    Fenske, NA
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1996, 22 (08) : 715 - 720
  • [5] The sentinel node in breast cancer - A multicenter validation study
    Krag, D
    Weaver, D
    Ashikaga, T
    Moffat, F
    Klimberg, VS
    Shriver, C
    Feldman, S
    Kusminsky, R
    Gadd, M
    Kuhn, J
    Harlow, S
    Beitsch, P
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (14) : 941 - 946
  • [6] Lenisa L, 1999, J EXP CLIN CANC RES, V18, P69
  • [7] Practical guidelines for optimal gamma probe detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: Results of a multi-institutional study
    Martin, RCG
    Edwards, MJ
    Wong, SL
    Tuttle, TM
    Carlson, DJ
    Brown, CM
    Noyes, RD
    Glaser, RL
    Vennekotter, DJ
    Turk, PS
    Tate, PS
    Sardi, A
    Cerrito, PB
    McMasters, KM
    [J]. SURGERY, 2000, 128 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [8] Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma - A multicenter trial
    Morton, DL
    Thompson, JF
    Essner, R
    Elashoff, R
    Stern, SL
    Nieweg, OE
    Roses, DF
    Karakousis, CP
    Mozzillo, N
    Reintgen, D
    Wang, HJ
    Glass, EC
    Cochran, AJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (04) : 453 - 463
  • [9] MORTON DL, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P392
  • [10] Will the true sentinel node please stand?
    Morton, DL
    Bostick, PJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 6 (01) : 12 - 14