Harnessing the science base: Results from a national programme using publicly-funded research centres to reshape firms' R&D

被引:24
作者
Mulligan, Kevin [1 ]
Lenihan, Helena [1 ]
Doran, Justin [2 ]
Roper, Stephen [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Kemmy Business Sch, Dept Econ, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Cork Univ, Dept Econ, Spatial & Reg Econ Res Ctr, Business Sch,Univ Coll Cork, Cork, Ireland
[3] Enterprise Res Ctr, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[4] Warwick Business Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Research centres; Collaboration; Firm-level R&D; Basic research; Applied research; Heterogeneous treatment effects; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS; INNOVATION ACTIVITIES; SECTORAL DIFFERENCES; ECONOMIC-BENEFITS; KNOWLEDGE; INDUSTRY; SUBSIDIES; UNIVERSITIES; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104468
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Since 2000 and the launch of Science Foundation Ireland, Irish policymakers have been involved in a large-scale national science policy programme. Starting from a position with little pre-existing research infrastructure beyond its traditional higher education system, Ireland allocated significant public resources to rapidly develop an extensive research centres programme. These centres are designed to harness knowledge embedded in the national science base to impact firm-level Research and Development (R&D). Each research centre focuses on basic and applied research (as opposed to development), targeted at prioritised sectors of the economy. Using a novel panel dataset (2007-2017), our analysis provides the first evaluation of these research centres. Results indicate that research centre collaborations increase firm-level R&D, and, over time, re-orientate collaborating firms' R&D towards more applied research. We also consider how impacts vary depending on the firms' char-acteristics (size and sector), and research centre characteristics. Our findings demonstrate that Ireland's policy programme improved firms' R&D profile, and suggest key policy lessons for other economies who might consider adopting a similar strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
ACS ZJ, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P363
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, REP RES PRIOR STEER
[3]   The decline of science in corporate R&D [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Patacconi, Andrea .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (01) :3-32
[4]   PhD trained employees and firms' transitions to upstream R&D activities [J].
Barge-Gil, Andres ;
D'Este, Pablo ;
Herrera, Liliana .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2021, 28 (04) :424-455
[5]   Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit? [J].
Beck, Mathias ;
Lopes-Bento, Cindy ;
Schenker-Wicki, Andrea .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) :869-883
[6]   PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE [J].
Becker, Bettina .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (05) :917-942
[7]   R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J].
Becker, W ;
Dietz, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (02) :209-223
[8]   Direct and mediated ties to universities: "Scientific" absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms [J].
Belderbos, Rene ;
Gilsing, Victor A. ;
Suzuki, Shinya .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2016, 14 (01) :32-52
[9]   Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment [J].
Boschma, RA .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (01) :61-74
[10]   Working with distant researchers-Distance and content in university-industry interaction [J].
Brostrom, Anders .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (10) :1311-1320