Harnessing the science base: Results from a national programme using publicly-funded research centres to reshape firms' R&D

被引:24
作者
Mulligan, Kevin [1 ]
Lenihan, Helena [1 ]
Doran, Justin [2 ]
Roper, Stephen [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Kemmy Business Sch, Dept Econ, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Cork Univ, Dept Econ, Spatial & Reg Econ Res Ctr, Business Sch,Univ Coll Cork, Cork, Ireland
[3] Enterprise Res Ctr, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[4] Warwick Business Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Research centres; Collaboration; Firm-level R&D; Basic research; Applied research; Heterogeneous treatment effects; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS; INNOVATION ACTIVITIES; SECTORAL DIFFERENCES; ECONOMIC-BENEFITS; KNOWLEDGE; INDUSTRY; SUBSIDIES; UNIVERSITIES; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104468
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Since 2000 and the launch of Science Foundation Ireland, Irish policymakers have been involved in a large-scale national science policy programme. Starting from a position with little pre-existing research infrastructure beyond its traditional higher education system, Ireland allocated significant public resources to rapidly develop an extensive research centres programme. These centres are designed to harness knowledge embedded in the national science base to impact firm-level Research and Development (R&D). Each research centre focuses on basic and applied research (as opposed to development), targeted at prioritised sectors of the economy. Using a novel panel dataset (2007-2017), our analysis provides the first evaluation of these research centres. Results indicate that research centre collaborations increase firm-level R&D, and, over time, re-orientate collaborating firms' R&D towards more applied research. We also consider how impacts vary depending on the firms' char-acteristics (size and sector), and research centre characteristics. Our findings demonstrate that Ireland's policy programme improved firms' R&D profile, and suggest key policy lessons for other economies who might consider adopting a similar strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
[61]   Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis [J].
Miotti, L ;
Sachwald, F .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (08) :1481-1499
[62]   More subsidies, more innovation? Evaluating whether a mix of subsides from regional, national and EU sources crowds out firm-level innovation [J].
Mulligan, Kevin ;
Lenihan, Helena ;
Doran, Justin .
REGIONAL STUDIES REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, 6 (01) :130-138
[63]   THE SIMPLE ECONOMICS OF BASIC SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH [J].
NELSON, RR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1959, 67 (03) :297-306
[64]   Public R&D support and firm performance: A multivariate dose-response analysis [J].
Nilsen, Oivind A. ;
Raknerud, Arvid ;
Iancu, Diana-Cristina .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (07)
[65]  
OECD, 2011, PUBL RES I MAPP SECT
[66]  
Pakes Ariel., 1984, RD, Patents, and Productivity
[67]   Positioning UK research and technology organizations as outward-facing technology-bases [J].
Readman, Jeff ;
Bessant, John ;
Neely, Andy ;
Twigg, David .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (01) :109-120
[68]   WHY DO FIRMS DO BASIC RESEARCH WITH THEIR OWN MONEY [J].
ROSENBERG, N .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1990, 19 (02) :165-174
[69]   Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: Sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties [J].
Salavisa, Isabel ;
Sousa, Cristina ;
Fontes, Margarida .
TECHNOVATION, 2012, 32 (06) :380-399
[70]   The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review [J].
Salter, AJ ;
Martin, BR .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (03) :509-532