Public R&D support and firm performance: A multivariate dose-response analysis

被引:26
作者
Nilsen, Oivind A. [1 ]
Raknerud, Arvid [2 ]
Iancu, Diana-Cristina [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Econ, Dept Econ, Bergen, Norway
[2] Stat Norway, Res Dept, Oslo, Norway
[3] Stat Norway, Div Stat Methods, Oslo, Norway
关键词
R&D; Public policy instruments; Firm performance; Multivariate dose-response; Treatment effects; Matching; Output additionality; DEVELOPMENT TAX CREDITS; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; DEVELOPMENT GRANTS; IMPACT; ADDITIONALITY; INCENTIVES; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2020.104067
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We analyse all the major sources of direct and indirect research and development (R&D) support to the business enterprise sector in a single country, Norway, for the period 2002-2013, treating the financial support for R&D from several instruments as a multivariate dose exposure. The output additionality of support to incumbent firms that regularly perform R&D (R&D-incumbents), which obtain about 65 per cent of all R&D support to business enterprises, is insignificant for any instrument or policy mixture. However, the estimated additionality of support to R&D-starters (firms without prior R&D activity), which obtain about 30 per cent of all R&D support, is generally positive. In this firm category, the main instruments for direct R&D support in Norway generate significantly less output and economic activity per NOK 1 million in support than do tax credits, despite the fact these instruments manage large project portfolios at considerable administrative costs. We do not identify positive effects of R&D support on labour productivity or the return on assets for any of the instruments. Our main policy implication is that R&D instruments for the business enterprise sector should be designed in favour of R&D-starters over R&D-incumbents, that is, shifting the focus from the intensive to the extensive margin.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ECONOMETRIC EVALUATI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, DOCUMENTS EC
[3]  
Arkhangelski D., 2019, 1905 CEMFI
[4]  
Baum C.F., 2016, ECOMOD
[5]  
Benedictow A., 2018, SAMFUNNSOKONOMISK AN
[6]   Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? [J].
Berube, Charles ;
Mohnen, Pierre .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (01) :206-225
[7]   Alternative Approaches to Evaluation in Empirical Microeconomics [J].
Blundell, Richard ;
Dias, Monica Costa .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2009, 44 (03) :565-640
[8]   R&D, International Sourcing, and the Joint Impact on Firm Performance [J].
Boler, Esther Ann ;
Moxnes, Andreas ;
Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (12) :3704-3739
[9]   The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Piselli, Paolo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (02) :442-457
[10]   Are Incentives for R&D Effective? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach [J].
Bronzini, Raffaello ;
Iachini, Eleonora .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2014, 6 (04) :100-134