Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms

被引:233
作者
Chang, Yi-Ying [1 ]
Hughes, Mathew [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Univ Business Sch, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
关键词
Small-and-medium sized firms; Ambidexterity; Innovation; Business performance; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; MARKET ORIENTATION; PRODUCT INNOVATION; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; OVERLOOKED ROLE; EXPLOITATION; ANTECEDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.emj.2011.08.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Balancing explorative and exploitative innovation ambidextrously has emerged as one of the foremost questions in management research. While a firm's ability to jointly pursue both exploitative and explorative innovation has been conceived as having positive performance effects, scholarly efforts to resolve the ambidexterity question have left a disproportionate gap in our understanding of how innovation ambidexterity can be achieved, particularly so in small-to-medium-sized firms (SMEs). The state of the debate is such that SMEs must largely rely on prescriptions tested with large firms to inform their ambidexterity initiatives. This study focuses on the characteristics of top managers and features of organizational structure and context in facilitating the appearance of ambidexterity in SMEs, and the mediation effect of innovation ambidexterity between structural, contextual, and leadership characteristics on SME performance. Results indicated that SMEs could achieve a close balance of explorative and exploitative innovations (BD) through shaping right international organizational structures and adopting appropriate leadership styles. Further, BD mediates the relationship between the structural, contextual, and leadership characteristics on SME performance. SMEs could benefit from BD with relatively resources available. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ADV STRUCTURAL EQUAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Multiple regression in behavioral research
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]   Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation [J].
Atuahene-Gima, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) :61-83
[7]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[8]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[9]   PRACTICAL ISSUES IN STRUCTURAL MODELING [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
CHOU, CP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1987, 16 (01) :78-117
[10]  
Birkinshaw J, 2004, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V45, P47