Effects of grayscale window/level parameters on breast lesion detectability

被引:17
作者
Johnson, JP [1 ]
Nafziger, J [1 ]
Krupinski, EA [1 ]
Lubin, J [1 ]
Roehrig, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Sarnoff Corp, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT | 2003年 / 5034卷
关键词
visual discrimination model; grayscale window/level; mammography; lesion detection; observer performance;
D O I
10.1117/12.480340
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The detectability of low-contrast lesions in medical images can be affected significantly by the choice of grayscale window width and level (W/L) for electronic display. Our objective was to measure the effects of various W/L conditions on lesion detectability in simulated and real mammographic images, and then correlate observer performance with predictions of detection thresholds derived from a visual discrimination model (VDM). In the first experiment, detection thresholds were measured in 2AFC trials for five W/L conditions applied to simulated mammographic backgrounds and lesions (i.e., Gaussian "masses" and blurred-disk "microcalcification clusters") using nonmedical observers. In the second experiment, the detectability of real microcalcification clusters in digitized mammograms was evaluated for three W/L conditions in an ROC observer study with mammographers. For the simulated images, there was generally good agreement between model and experimental thresholds and their variations across W/L conditions. Both experimental and model results showed significant reductions in thresholds when W/L processing was applied locally near the lesion. ROC results with digitized mammograms read by radiologists, however, failed to show enhanced detection of microcalcifications using a localized W/L frame, probably due to the nonuniform appearance of parenchymal tissue across the image.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 473
页数:12
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
AHUMADA AJ, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2411, P355
[2]   Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise [J].
Burgess, AE ;
Jacobson, FL ;
Judy, PF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) :419-437
[3]   Observer performance evaluation of a method of simulating abnormalities in mammograms [J].
Chakraborty, DP ;
Conant, EF ;
Johnson, JP .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 4686 :263-272
[4]   Anomalous nodule visibility effects in mammographic images [J].
Chakraborty, DP ;
Kundel, HL .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 4324 :68-76
[5]  
Daly Scott, 1993, P179
[6]  
Heath M, 2001, IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, P212
[7]   Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human-observer performance [J].
Jackson, WB ;
Said, MR ;
Jared, DA ;
Larimer, JO ;
Gille, JL ;
Lubin, J .
IMAGE PERCEPTION: MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3036 :64-73
[8]   Perceptually optimized compression of mammograms [J].
Johnson, JP ;
Krupinski, E ;
Nafziger, J ;
Lubin, J ;
Wus, J ;
Roehrig, H .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 4686 :256-262
[9]   Visual discrimination modeling of lesion detectability [J].
Johnson, JP ;
Lubin, J ;
Nafziger, J ;
Chakraborty, D .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 4686 :248-255
[10]   Visual discrimination model for digital mammography [J].
Johnson, JP ;
Lubin, J ;
Krupinski, EA ;
Peterson, HA ;
Roehrig, H ;
Baysinger, A .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 3663 :253-263