Corneal thickness measurements and frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities in ocular hypertensive eyes

被引:79
作者
Medeiros, FA
Sample, PA
Weinreb, RN
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Hamilton Glaucoma Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Visual Funct Lab, Dept Ophthalmol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00734-6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: It has been suggested that some patients currently diagnosed with ocular hypertension (OHT) may have thicker than average corneas that result in an overestimation of their true intraocular pressure. Consequently, patients with OHT with greater corneal thickness may be at a lower risk for functional glaucomatous damage, including visual field loss measured with frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of FDT perimetry deficits in patients with OHT and to correlate these findings with central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements. Design: Observational case control study. Participants and Controls: Sixty-five patients with OHT with normal optic discs and normal standard achromatic automated perimetry (SAP) visual fields and 52 normal control subjects. Methods: All participants underwent SAP, FDT perimetry, and CCT measurements using ultrasound pachymetry. Main Outcome Measures: CCT measurements in patients with OHT with abnormal repeatable FDT test results were compared with CCT measurements in patients with OHT with normal FDT results. In addition, CCT measurements in patients with OHT were compared with CCT measurements in normal control subjects. Results: Fourteen of 65 patients with OHT (21.5%) demonstrated repeatable FDT abnormalities. The mean CCT of patients with OHT with abnormal FDT results was significantly lower than the mean CCT of patients with OHT with normal FDT results (542+/-35 mum versus 575+/-35 mum; P = 0.003). The mean CCT in the normal control group was 556+/-36 mum. The mean CCT in patients with OHT with normal FDT results was significantly higher than in normal subjects (P = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found between mean CCT in normal subjects and in patients with OHT with abnormal FDT results (P = 0.18). Conclusions: Patients currently diagnosed with OHT, but with visual field loss detected by FDT perimetry, had significantly lower CCT measurements than patients with OHT with normal FDT results. These findings suggest that patients with OHT with thinner corneas are more likely to develop early glaucomatous functional damage and that CCT measurements should be taken into account when assessing risk for the development of glaucoma among OHT subjects. (C) 2003 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1903 / 1908
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Anderson AJ, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, P398
[2]   Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness [J].
Argus, WA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12) :1810-1812
[3]   Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects [J].
Bayer, AU ;
Erb, C .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (05) :1009-1017
[4]   Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) [J].
Brandt, JD ;
Beiser, JA ;
Kass, MA ;
Gordon, MO .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (10) :1779-1788
[5]   The influence of corneal thickness on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma [J].
Brandt, JD .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2001, 10 (05) :S65-S67
[6]   Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice [J].
Burnstein, Y ;
Ellish, NJ ;
Magbalon, M ;
Higginbotham, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) :328-333
[7]   Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry [J].
Casson, R ;
James, B ;
Rubinstein, A ;
Ali, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (03) :360-362
[8]   Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss [J].
Cello, KE ;
Nelson-Quigg, JM ;
Johnson, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) :314-322
[9]  
Chauhan BC, 1999, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V40, P648
[10]  
Copt RP, 1999, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V117, P14