One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty

被引:84
作者
Legalery, P [1 ]
Schiele, F [1 ]
Seronde, MF [1 ]
Meneveau, N [1 ]
Wei, H [1 ]
Didier, K [1 ]
Blonde, MC [1 ]
Caulfield, F [1 ]
Bassand, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Jean Minjoz, EA 3920, Dept Cardiol, F-25030 Besancon, France
关键词
coronary angioplasty; fractional flow reserve; stent;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehi484
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims In patients submitted to coronary angiography, fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment by a pressure wire can be used to guide the decision for revascularization. Routine application of FFR assessment and 1-year outcome of patients are poorly documented. The aim of this study was to report a 4-year single-centre experience where the use of FFR for decision making in equivocal lesions is encouraged. Methods and results A prospective registry was designed to collect clinical and angiographic characteristics, as well as 1-year clinical follow-up for all patients submitted to FFR assessment. The decisional cut-off point for revascularization was 0.80. Over a 4-year period, out of 6415 coronary angiographies, FFR was measured in 407 ( 6.3%) patients ( 469 lesions). FFR was assessed through 4 or 5 Fr diagnostic catheters in 330 ( 81%). Median FFR value was 0.87 ( 0.80; 0.93). On the basis of FFR results, 271 ( 67%) patients were treated with medical therapy alone. A subset of 71 ( 17%) patients were not treated in accordance with the results of FFR. All patients but four (i.e. 99%) had 1-year clinical follow-up. Three hundred and forty four (85%) were free from clinical event, six (1.5%) patients died five (4%) had an acute coronary syndrome, and 20 (5%) underwent target-vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was comparable in patients with vs. without revascularization (0.94 +/- 0.02 and 0.93 +/- 0.01, respectively). Patients had signficantly better 1-year outcome when treated in accordance with the results of the FFR assessment. Conclusion In routine practice, FFR assessment during diagnostic angiography was performed in 6.3%. On the basis of FFR, two-thirds of patients with 'intermediate' lesions were left unrevascularized, with a favourable outcome, when FFR was above 0.80. These data suggest that routine use of FFR during diagnostic catheterization is feasible, safe, and provide help to guide decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:2623 / 2629
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Diastolic fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of moderate coronary artery stenoses - Comparison with fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve [J].
Abe, M ;
Tomiyama, H ;
Yoshida, H ;
Doba, N .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (19) :2365-2370
[2]   Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis - A randomized trial [J].
Bech, GJW ;
De Bruyne, S ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
de Muinck, ED ;
Hoorntje, JC ;
Escaned, J ;
Stella, PR ;
Boersma, E ;
Bartunek, J ;
Koolen, JJ ;
Wijns, W .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (24) :2928-2934
[3]   Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement [J].
Bech, GJW ;
De Bruyne, B ;
Bonnier, HJRM ;
Bartunek, J ;
Wijns, W ;
Peels, K ;
Heyndrickx, GR ;
Koolen, JJ ;
Pijls, NHJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (04) :841-847
[4]   Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood mow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease [J].
Chamuleau, SAJ ;
Meuwissen, M ;
van Eck-Smit, BLF ;
Koch, KT ;
de Jong, A ;
de Winter, RJ ;
Schotborgh, CE ;
Bax, M ;
Verberne, HJ ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Piek, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (05) :1316-1322
[5]   Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis [J].
Chamuleau, SAJ ;
Meuwissen, M ;
Koch, KT ;
van Eck-Smit, BLF ;
Tio, RA ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Piek, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 89 (04) :377-380
[6]   Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses - Theoretical basis and animal validation [J].
De Bruyne, B ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Heyndrickx, GR ;
Hodeige, D ;
Kirkeeide, R ;
Gould, KL .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (15) :1840-1847
[7]   Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5′-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans [J].
De Bruyne, B ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Barbato, E ;
Bartunek, J ;
Bech, JW ;
Wijns, W ;
Heyndrickx, GR .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (14) :1877-1883
[8]   Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction [J].
De Bruyne, B ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Bartunek, J ;
Kulecki, K ;
Bech, JW ;
De Winter, H ;
Van Crombrugge, P ;
Heyndrickx, GR ;
Wijns, W .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (02) :157-162
[9]   TRANSSTENOTIC CORONARY PRESSURE-GRADIENT MEASUREMENT IN HUMANS - IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO EVALUATION OF A NEW PRESSURE MONITORING ANGIOPLASTY GUIDE-WIRE [J].
DEBRUYNE, B ;
PIJLS, NHJ ;
PAULUS, WJ ;
VANTRIMPONT, PJ ;
SYS, SU ;
HEYNDRICKX, GR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (01) :119-126
[10]   Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans - Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve [J].
deBruyne, B ;
Bartunek, J ;
Sys, SU ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Heyndrickx, GR ;
Wijns, W .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) :1842-1849