Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

被引:41
作者
Tothill, P. [1 ]
Hannan, W. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Phys Med, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
accuracy; BMD; DXA; precision;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-007-0382-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Long-term precision of two Hologic DXA scanners was derived from repeated clinical measurements. With typical subjects, the long-term coefficients of variation were about twice the short-term. The accuracy of the measurement of changes was compromised by anomalies, but this did not seriously affect clinical conclusions. Introduction Long-term precision and accuracy of BMD measurements need review. Methods Long-term precision was examined by selecting, from Hologic databases, subjects who had had four scans over a period of 2 to 5 years and was calculated from the SEE of a regression of BMD against time. Accuracy was assessed from relationships between changes (Delta) in BA, BMD and BMC. Results For one group of subjects, the long-term precision was 2.4% for lumbar spine, 2.3% for total hip and 2.7% for femoral neck when expressed as CVs. These values were nearly twice the short-term CVs of 1.3% for spine, 1.2% for total hip and 1.4% for femoral neck. For another group, a negative exponential regression gave a better fit, leading to CVs of 1.3% for the spine, 1.4% for total hip and 2.1% for femoral neck. Significant correlations between Delta BA and Delta BMC were found. These led to an underestimate of Delta BMD in spine and hip by 25%. Conclusions The poorer long-term precision for typical patients should be borne in mind in monitoring progress. The underestimate of changes could account for only a part of the underestimation by BMD measurements of the anti-fracture effects of anti-resorptive drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1523
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
An overlying femur bone fat panniculus affects mass measurement [J].
Binkley, N ;
Krueger, D ;
Vallarta-Ast, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2003, 6 (03) :199-204
[2]
Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: Bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, or both? [J].
Bonnick, SL ;
Shulman, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 119 (04) :25S-31S
[3]
Importance of precision in bone density measurements [J].
Bonnick, SL ;
Johnston, CC ;
Kleerekoper, M ;
Lindsay, R ;
Miller, P ;
Sherwood, L ;
Siris, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2001, 4 (02) :105-110
[4]
Change in lumbar spine BMD and vertebral fracture risk reduction in teriparatide-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [J].
Chen, Peiqi ;
Miller, Paul D. ;
Delmas, Pierre D. ;
Misurski, Derek A. ;
Krege, John H. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2006, 21 (11) :1785-1790
[5]
Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs [J].
Cummings, SR ;
Karpf, DB ;
Harris, F ;
Genant, HK ;
Ensrud, K ;
LaCroix, AZ ;
Black, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 112 (04) :281-289
[6]
ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES [J].
GLUER, CC ;
BLAKE, G ;
LU, Y ;
BLUNT, BA ;
JERGAS, M ;
GENANT, HK .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 5 (04) :262-270
[7]
HANGARTNER TN, 2007, OSTEOPOROS INT
[9]
Lenchik Leon, 2002, J Clin Densitom, V5 Suppl, pS29, DOI 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S29
[10]
Monitoring osteoporosis therapies [J].
Miller P.D. .
Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2007, 5 (1) :38-43