Assessing the environmental impact of two options for small-scale wastewater treatment: comparing a reedbed and an aerated biological filter using a life cycle approach

被引:117
作者
Dixon, A [1 ]
Simon, M
Burkitt, T
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Life Cycle Design Grp, Sch Engn, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Oceans ESU Ltd, Bradford BD8 9TF, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
reedbed; wastewater; treatment; life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.1016/S0925-8574(03)00007-7
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Different options for wastewater treatment have different performance characteristics and also different direct impacts on the environment. These impacts occur over the whole life cycle of the treatment system. Natural wastewater systems such as the reedbed may offer reduced whole life cycle environmental impacts compared to systems with more technical and material sophistication. This paper describes a study of the life cycle impacts of two options for smallscale wastewater treatment which are a horizontal flow reedbed system and a package bio-filtration plant. The study is limited to impacts during the construction and operation phases. Energy use, CO2 emission and solid emissions were chosen as the environmental aspects. It was found that overall the reedbed and conventional systems were quite similar in terms of life cycle energy use. Transport occurring during construction and operational maintenance was a key contributor to energy use and CO2 emissions. The environmental impact of the reedbed reduced if the soil excavated on site was suitable for re-use in the infill. The effect on the results of the different assumptions made during the study was checked using sensitivity analysis. This analysis also helped us to identify recommendations for reducing the life cycle impact of the reedbed system. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Assessment of the sustainability of alternatives for the disposal of domestic sanitary waste [J].
Ashley, RM ;
Souter, N ;
Butler, D ;
Davies, J ;
Dunkerley, J ;
Hendry, S .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (05) :251-258
[2]   Developing a model based decision support tool for the identification of sustainable treatment options for domestic wastewater [J].
Balkema, AJ ;
Preisig, HA ;
Otterpohl, R ;
Lambert, AJD ;
Weijers, SR .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 43 (07) :265-270
[3]   Challenges for the development of advanced constructed wetlands technology [J].
Bavor, HJ ;
Roser, DJ ;
Adcock, PW .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 32 (03) :13-20
[4]   How 'green' are aquaculture, constructed wetlands and conventional wastewater treatment systems? [J].
Brix, H .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 40 (03) :45-50
[5]   Reed bed treatment systems for sewage treatment in the United Kingdom - The first 10 years' experience [J].
Cooper, P ;
Green, B .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 32 (03) :317-327
[6]   Assessing management options for wastewater treatment works in the context of life cycle assessment [J].
Dennison, FJ ;
Azapagic, A ;
Clift, R ;
Colbourne, JS .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 38 (11) :23-30
[7]   Life Cycle Assessment: Comparing strategic options for the mains infrastructure - Part I [J].
Dennison, FJ ;
Azapagic, A ;
Clift, R ;
Colbourne, JS .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (10-11) :315-319
[8]  
EMMERSON RHC, 1995, J CHART INST WATER E, V9, P317
[9]   Establishing the true costs and benefits of environmental protection and enhancement in the aquatic environment [J].
Gaterell, MR ;
Lester, JN .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 249 (1-3) :25-37
[10]   LCA of Concrete and Steel Building Frames [J].
Jonsson, Asa ;
Bjorklund, Thomas ;
Tillman, Anne-Marie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 1998, 3 (04) :216-224