Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development

被引:243
作者
Krishnan, V [1 ]
Gupta, S
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Dept Management, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] I2 Technol, Dallas, TX 75234 USA
关键词
product development; modular platforms; component commonality; design reuse;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.47.1.52.10665
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In their quest to manage the complexity of offering greater product variety, firms in many industries are considering platform-based product development. Product platforms, which are component and subsystem assets shared across a product-family, enable a firm to better leverage investments in product design and development. While the platform approach offers a number of benefits, it also imposes certain additional costs that have not received adequate research attention. In this paper, we use an industrial example both to illustrate some of the costs and benefits of platform-based product development and to motivate the development of a mathematical model. The model is formulated to better understand the appropriateness of product platforms and their impact on product-planning decisions. Our results indicate that platforms are not appropriate for extreme levels of market diversity or high levels of nonplatform scale economies. Also, a firm's product positioning and introduction sequence decisions made during the product-planning phase are significantly impacted by the presence of platforms. Specifically, a platform increases the separation among products and offers a multitude of product introduction strategies. We translate our model findings into a managerial framework.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 68
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
MEYER JH, 1993, SLOAN MANAGEMENT SPR, P29
[12]   Metrics for managing research and development in the context of the product family [J].
Meyer, MH ;
Tertzakian, P ;
Utterback, JM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (01) :88-111
[13]  
Meyer MH, 1997, The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership
[14]  
Moorthy K.S., 1984, MARKET SCI, V3, P288, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.3.4.288, DOI 10.1287/MKSC.3.4.288]
[15]   MARKET-SEGMENTATION, CANNIBALIZATION, AND THE TIMING OF PRODUCT INTRODUCTIONS [J].
MOORTHY, KS ;
PNG, IPL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1992, 38 (03) :345-359
[16]   MONOPOLY AND PRODUCT QUALITY [J].
MUSSA, M ;
ROSEN, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1978, 18 (02) :301-317
[17]  
RAMDAS K, 1998, CROSS FUNCTIONAL APP
[18]  
Robertson D, 1998, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V39, P19
[19]  
Sanderson S. W., 1996, MANAGING PRODUCT FAM
[20]   THE ROLE OF PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE IN THE MANUFACTURING FIRM [J].
ULRICH, K .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1995, 24 (03) :419-440