Interventional radiologic management of renal transplant dysfunction: Indications, limitations, and technical considerations

被引:71
作者
Kobayashi, Katsuhiro
Censullo, Michael L.
Rossman, Lucho L.
Kyriakides, Polina N.
Kahan, Barry D.
Cohen, Alan M.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Med Sch, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Med Sch, Div Immunol & Organ Transplantat, Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.274065135
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for most patients with end-stage renal disease. However, in spite of continuous progress in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive therapy, a wide variety of vascular and nonvascular complications can arise postoperatively. Vascular complications include transplant renal artery stenosis, arteriovenous fistulas or intrarenal pseudoaneurysms following renal transplant biopsy, extrarenal pseudoaneurysms, and graft thrombosis. Nonvascular complications include urologic complications (eg, ureteral obstruction, urine leak) and perigraft fluid collections (eg, lymphocele, abscess, hematoma, urinoma). These postoperative complications can be diagnosed and managed with minimally invasive techniques; however, an understanding of renal transplant anatomy and the risks of posttransplantation immunosuppressive therapy unique to this patient population is essential to their successful application. In addition, familiarity with the indications for and limitations of these techniques as well as collaboration between the radiologist and the transplantation surgeon are vital for maximizing the chances of renal allograft survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / U43
页数:23
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Ahmad Iftikhar, 2004, Semin Intervent Radiol, V21, P275, DOI 10.1055/s-2004-861562
[2]   Complications of renal transplantation [J].
Akbar, SA ;
Jafri, SZH ;
Amendola, MA ;
Madrazo, BL ;
Salem, R ;
Bis, KG .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (05) :1335-1356
[3]   Percutaneous renal biopsy: Three years of experience with the Biopty® gun in 761 cases - A survey of results and complications [J].
Bach D. ;
Wirth C. ;
Schott G. ;
Hollenbeck M. ;
Grabensee B. .
International Urology and Nephrology, 1999, 31 (1) :15-22
[4]   Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of arteriovenous fistula after renal transplant biopsy [J].
Bagga, H ;
Bis, KG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1509-1511
[5]   METAANALYSIS OF THE RELATIVE NEPHROTOXICITY OF HIGH-OSMOLALITY AND LOW-OSMOLALITY IODINATED CONTRAST-MEDIA [J].
BARRETT, BJ ;
CARLISLE, EJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (01) :171-178
[6]   Ultrasound of renal transplantation [J].
Baxter, GM .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (10) :802-818
[7]   COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS TO OBTAIN PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE CORE BIOPSIES OF A RENAL-ALLOGRAFT [J].
BECKINGHAM, IJ ;
NICHOLSON, ML ;
KIRK, G ;
VEITCH, PS ;
BELL, PRF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (06) :898-899
[8]   Transplant renal artery stenosis: Outcome after percutaneous intervention [J].
Beecroft, JR ;
Rajan, DK ;
Clark, TWI ;
Robinette, M ;
Stavropoulos, SW .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (12) :1407-1413
[9]   UROLOGIC COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION - ROLE OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGIC PROCEDURES [J].
BENNETT, LN ;
VOEGELI, DR ;
CRUMMY, AB ;
MCDERMOTT, JC ;
JENSEN, SR ;
SOLLINGER, HW .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (02) :531-536
[10]  
BENOIT G, 1990, TRANSPLANT INT, V3, P137