Comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation pretreatment for enhanced virus removal using microfiltration membranes

被引:167
作者
Zhu, BT
Clifford, DA
Chellam, S
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Dept Chem Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
microfiltration; coagulation; electrocoagulation; virus; bacteriophage; water treatment; membrane filtration;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research studied virus removal by iron electrocoagulation (EC) followed by microfiltration (MF) in water treatment using the MS2 bacteriophage as a tracer virus. In the absence of EC, MF alone achieved less than a 0.5-log removal of MS2 virus, but, as the iron-coagulant dosage increased, the log virus removal increased dramatically. More than 4-log virus removal, as required by the Surface Water Treatment Rule, was achieved with 6-9mg/L Fe3+. The experimental data indicated that at lower iron dosages and pH (< similar to 8 mg Fe/L and pH 6.3 and 7.3) negatively charged MS2 viruses first adsorbed onto the positively charged iron hydroxide floc particles before being removed by MF. At higher iron dosages and pH (> similar to 9 mg Fe/L and pH 8.3), virus removal was attributed predominantly to enmeshment and subsequent removal by MF. Additionally, the experimental data showed no obvious influence of ionic strength in the natural water range of 10(-7)-10(-2) M on MS2 virus removal by EC-MF. Finally, EC pretreatment significantly outperformed chemical coagulation pretreatment for virus removal. The proposed mechanism for this improved performance by EC is that locally higher iron and virus concentrations and locally lower pH near the anode improved MS2 enmeshment by iron floes as well as adsorption of MS2 viruses onto the iron floc particles. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3098 / 3108
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Brock T.D., 1991, BIOL MICROORGANISMS, VSixth
[2]   Decolorization of reactive dye solutions by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes [J].
Can, OT ;
Bayramoglu, M ;
Kobya, M .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2003, 42 (14) :3391-3396
[3]   Investigation on the electrolysis voltage of electrocoagulation [J].
Chen, XM ;
Chen, GH ;
Yue, PL .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2002, 57 (13) :2449-2455
[4]  
COFFEY BM, 1993, EVALUATION MICROFILT
[5]   Comparative electrochemical inactivation of bacteria and bacteriophage [J].
Drees, KP ;
Abbaszadegan, M ;
Maier, RM .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (10) :2291-2300
[6]  
*EPA, 2001, 815C01001 EPA
[7]  
[Greenberg A.E. Standard Methods Standard Methods], 1998, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V20th
[8]   Preliminary investigation of electrocoagulation as a substitute for chemical coagulation [J].
Han, M ;
Song, J ;
Kwon, A .
3RD WORLD WATER CONGRESS: DRINKING WATER TREATMENT, 2002, 2 (5-6) :73-76
[9]  
HINGSTON FJ, 1981, ADSORPTION INORGANIC
[10]   A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation [J].
Holt, PK ;
Barton, GW ;
Wark, M ;
Mitchell, CA .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2002, 211 (2-3) :233-248