Modeling for intergroup comparisons of imaging data

被引:111
作者
Woods, RP [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, SCH MED, DEPT NEUROL, LOS ANGELES, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.1996.0058
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Intergroup comparisons pose unique challenges in the analysis of functional imaging data. Imperfections in intersubject stereotaxis can give rise to artifactual results and make it particularly important to allow for intersubject differences in task-related changes when formulating statistical models. Because intergroup comparisons generally involve inferences about the populations from which the subjects were drawn rather than inferences about the particular subjects themselves, subjects must be treated as random rather than fixed effects in the statistical model. These requirements, when combined with the need to adjust for multiple spatial comparisons, result in low statistical power when the number of subjects in each group is small. Functional imaging studies to identify differences between groups generally require many more subjects than other types of functional imaging studies and require careful advance planning to maximize the likelihood of reaching meaningful conclusions. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:S84 / S94
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1967, ATLAS ANATOMIE STERE
[2]   A STEREOTACTIC METHOD OF ANATOMICAL LOCALIZATION FOR POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
FOX, PT ;
PERLMUTTER, JS ;
RAICHLE, ME .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (01) :141-153
[3]  
Friston Karl J., 1996, P363
[4]  
Neter J., 1990, APPL LINEAR STAT MET
[5]  
Talairach G., 1988, Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
[6]  
Woods Roger P., 1996, P313
[7]  
WOODS RP, 1993, INT CONGR SER, V1030, P391
[8]   MRI-PET REGISTRATION WITH AUTOMATED ALGORITHM [J].
WOODS, RP ;
MAZZIOTTA, JC ;
CHERRY, SR .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1993, 17 (04) :536-546
[9]  
WORSLEY KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, pS71