Majority versus minority dynamics: Phase transition in an interacting two-state spin system

被引:96
作者
Mobilia, M [1 ]
Redner, S
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Ctr Biodynam, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Ctr Polymer Studies, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Phys, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW E | 2003年 / 68卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevE.68.046106
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
We introduce a simple model of opinion dynamics in which binary-state agents evolve due to the influence of agents in a local neighborhood. In a single update step, a fixed-size group is defined and all agents in the group adopt the state of the local majority with probability p or that of the local minority with probability 1-p. For group size G=3, there is a phase transition at p(c)=2/3 in all spatial dimensions. For p>p(c), the global majority quickly predominates, while for p<p(c), the system is driven to a mixed state in which the densities of agents in each state are equal. For p=p(c), the average magnetization (the difference in the density of agents in the two states) is conserved and the system obeys classical voter model dynamics. In one dimension and within a Kirkwood decoupling scheme, the final magnetization in a finite-length system has a nontrivial dependence on the initial magnetization for all pnot equalp(c), in agreement with numerical results. At p(c), the exact two-spin correlation functions decay algebraically toward the value 1 and the system coarsens as in the classical voter model.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Handbook of mathematical functions
[2]  
Balescu R., 1975, Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics
[3]   Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes [J].
Ben-Naim, E ;
Krapivsky, PL ;
Redner, S .
PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2003, 183 (3-4) :190-204
[4]   Damage spreading, coarsening dynamics and distribution of political votes in Sznajd model on square lattice [J].
Bernardes, AT ;
Costa, UMS ;
Araujo, AD ;
Stauffer, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2001, 12 (02) :159-167
[5]   Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence [J].
Castellano, C ;
Marsili, M ;
Vespignani, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 85 (16) :3536-3539
[6]  
Chen P., UNPUB
[7]   COALESCING RANDOM-WALKS AND VOTER MODEL CONSENSUS TIMES ON THE TORUS IN ZD [J].
COX, JT .
ANNALS OF PROBABILITY, 1989, 17 (04) :1333-1366
[8]   Exact results for kinetics of catalytic reactions [J].
Frachebourg, L ;
Krapivsky, PL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1996, 53 (04) :R3009-R3012
[9]   Fixation in a cyclic Lotka-Volterra model [J].
Frachebourg, L ;
Krapivsky, PL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1998, 31 (15) :L287-L293
[10]   Application of statistical physics to politics [J].
Galam, S .
PHYSICA A, 1999, 274 (1-2) :132-139