The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study

被引:145
作者
Innes, ME [1 ]
Umraw, N [1 ]
Fish, JS [1 ]
Gomez, M [1 ]
Cartotto, RC [1 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Ross Tilley Burn Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
donor site; re-epithelialization; burns; silver; occlusive dressing;
D O I
10.1016/S0305-4179(01)00015-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Acticoat, a new silver-coated dressing, produces a moist healing environment along with the sustained release of ionic silver for improved microbial control. These properties suggest that Acticoat might be a useful donor site dressing. However, there are no human studies which assess Acticoat for this use. The purpose of this study was to compare the healing of human skin graft donor sites dressed with Acticoat, to the healing of those dressed with Allevyn, an occlusive moist-healing environment material, which is our standard donor site dressing. In burn patients who had undergone burn excision and grafting, identical side-by-side split thickness donor site wound pairs were dressed with Allevyn and Acticoat. Re-epithelialization was directly assessed daily by a single observer from post-operative day 6 onward, and by four independent observers who rated the extent of re-epithelialization by viewing standardized digital images of the wounds that had been obtained on post-operative days 6, 8, 10, and 12. Donor sites were swabbed for bacterial culture on days 3, 6, and 9. Subsequently, each study donor site scar was rated by a blinded observer using the Vancouver Scar Scale at 1, 2, and 3 months. Sixteen paired sites in 15 patients (3 female, 12 male) were studied. Donor sites dressed with Allevyn were > 90% re-epithelialized at a mean of 9.1 +/- 1.6 days while donor sites dressed with Acticoat required a mean of 14.5 +/- 6.7 days to achieve > 90% re-epithelialization (P = 0.004). The Allevyn sites had significantly greater estimated re-epithelialization at days 6, 8, 10 and 12 than the Acticoat sites based on the observations of the digital images. There were no significant differences in the incidence of positive bacterial cultures with either dressing at days 3, 6, and 9. Donor sites dressed with Acticoat had significantly worse scars at I and 2 months but this difference resolved by 3 months. Our findings do not support the use of Acticoat as a skin graft donor site dressing. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 627
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ATTWOOD AI, 1989, BR J PLASTIC SURG, V42, P1373
[2]   COMPARISON OF SYNTHETIC ADHESIVE MOISTURE VAPOR PERMEABLE AND FINE MESH GAUZE DRESSINGS FOR SPLIT-THICKNESS SKIN-GRAFT DONOR SITES [J].
BARNETT, A ;
BERKOWITZ, RL ;
MILLS, R ;
VISTNES, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 145 (03) :379-381
[3]  
Baryza Mary Jo, 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P535, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013
[4]  
BERNARDI W, 1847, Z ERFAHRUNGSHEILKUNS, V2, P219
[5]  
Bettinger David, 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P59, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199501000-00011
[6]  
Cadier M. A., 1996, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V17, P246, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199605000-00012
[7]  
Griswold John A., 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P136, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199503000-00008
[8]  
GUYATT G, 2000, COMMUNICATION 0719
[9]   USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .2. HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THERAPY OR PREVENTION .A. ARE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY VALID [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
SACKETT, DL ;
COOK, DJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (21) :2598-2601
[10]   Pilot study of a unique film dressing for the treatment of donor site wounds [J].
Himel, HN ;
Ratliff, CR ;
Baruch, LD ;
Rodeheaver, GT .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 1998, 19 (01) :62-65